Most people believe that stricter punishment should be given for traffic offences. To what extent do you agree?
The issue of breaking traffic rules has been matter of concern for people at large. It challenges the safety parameters and because of this many people opine that strict punishments can overcome this problem. While I accept this to a certain extent, I also think that other measures should be taken along with strict punishments to make our roads safer.
We all know that the traffic rules has its importance and should be followed obediently. However, there are people who do not care for such laws in the country. As an example, people drive bike without helmet. Admittedly, the rules are made for the safety and proper flow of traffic but rarely some people understand. In this case, if they are fined for not wearing a helmet, next time they would make sure that they own a helmet while driving a motor-bike. Thus, legal punishment can only ascertain that mistakes are not repeated.Undoubtedly, the strict punishments are vital to have the rules in place otherwise few people would not even bother to know the correct way of driving. In every country, the law exists to pay penalty for minor offences and suspension of driver's license for major offences. In fatal cases, the law even charge the accused person for Imprisonment. As and example, in 2004, strict law was enforced for punishing the people who drink and drive, resulting into reduced number of road accidents. This example proves that strict punishments are essential to make people follow the rules on regular basis.
Moreover, the other ways of managing the traffic parameters should not be ignored. Firstly, the driving license should be given only after scrutinizing the candidates driving skills. In some countries, the officials are bribed to issue the driver's license to the person who does not show adequate driving skills. Secondly, the administrative bodies should run the awareness campaign to motivate the citizens to follow the traffic rules religiously. Thus, the government initiatives would contribute efficiently in this area.
In conclusion, I pen down saying that only strict rules cannot be the solution to the burning problem of traffic incidents; the other measures such as awareness drives and checks on issuing of driver's license should also be followed rigorously to control the road accidents.
- Over consuming sugar is unhealthy. Some people think that government should take responsibility to control it. Others think that individual should take responsibility of sugar intake. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- A while ago you have lent a friend a suitcase, which he/she has not returned yet. Write a letter to him/her reminding to bring it back and say-What suitcase and when dud he/she borrow it?-Why do you need it back?-What should he/she do about it? 64
- Most people believe that stricter punishment should be given for traffic offences To what extent do you agree 86
- Pollution and other environmental problems are resulting from the way that many countries are developing and becoming richer. Some think this cannot be avoided. 78
- In many countries it is now illegal to smoke in public places. It is only fair that people who wish to smoke should have to leave the building. Do you agree or disagree?Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Undoubtedly
...scertain that mistakes are not repeated.Undoubtedly, the strict punishments are vital to ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 833, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r offences. In fatal cases, the law even charge the accused person for Imprisonme...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15240641711 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70616900471 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521390374332 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6873388839 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.421052632 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263550497748 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857675335184 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442848563341 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15679926608 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045934288498 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.