News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.
Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is your opinion about this?
News stories provide us information on various subjects. It is generally believed that when this information comes with images they provide more insight. I opine that it is true.
News stories provide us Bulletins on TV and newspapers about affairs of the country. For example, we are able to know the progress of the voting through the news on TV and who the leaders of the party are through the images and the identity of the faces. We are also updated about sports that are being played in various parts of the world like the cricket match between India and Pakistan. We also recognize these players easily as we have watched them appear in the news several times.
When stories are portrayed via illustrations they help us become familiar with the situations. Crime rates have increased in certain areas of Dhaka. So when a crime takes place and that appears in the pictures people become more alert when travelling through that particular area or route. For instance, there has been strike in Shahbag for several days. The people who did not know the area were able to get familiar with them through medium like the tv or newspaper. In addition, these images supply additional information that might not have been expressed in words.
However, in some scenarios the images are not sufficient to provide the details. We need the support of words to depict the situation. For example, images of a murder are generally covered so that only the face of the victim is visible. Therefore, the accompanied story helps us get a clear idea of the brutality of the crime.
In conclusion, though in some situation it is difficult to perceive the meaning of the images without the help of the stories but most of the time the images provide a much clearer picture of the scenarios than words itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | bashirrezakarimi | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | PALAK AHUJA | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Kazimobarak | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | olParya | 56 | view |
- You recently attended a meeting at a hotel. When you returned home, you found you had left some important papers at the hotel.Write a letter to the manager of the hotel. In your letter• say where you think you left the papers• explain why they are so 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 61
- You recently attended a conference and you would like to give a presentation about the information you gained by attending the conference Write a letter to your manager asking for permission to give a presentation In your letter describe what type of pres 73
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these vi 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...em appear in the news several times. When stories are portrayed via illustrations...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81028938907 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46775715459 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504823151125 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5559959328 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1111111111 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2777777778 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168571309328 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491910914463 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501403225013 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086785118574 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323659571156 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.