Nowadays, the internet and television have given ordinary people a chance to become famous. IS this a positive or negative development.
It is a fact that with the advancement in technology such as the World Wide Web and television, individuals have enough opportunity to become well-known people. In my perspective, this is a positive development as it assists less fortunate people to exhibit their talent and recognize the hard-working efficient people of the country.
Discussing the argument of why audio-video visuals and web are positive for ordinary people to become well-known. The first and the most compelling reason is recognition of their great abilities and extraordinary skills. In other words, internet and television have made it possible for the middle class and less fortunate individuals to express their versatile skills to the world, which if found extra-ordinary, caters them to become known and recognized. For instance, a recent video of a 7-year young child singing classical music from western India became popular, which aided vivid well-known artists to contact him and encourage the child to take a career in singing.
Another argument to support the positive aspect of the internet and televisions for ordinary human beings to become known is it helps to appreciate the hard work of lesser-known citizens of the country. To be precise, there are many individuals who are working hard for the betterment of the nation but are not known to the people. For example, Isro team became popular when several videos of their recent scientific achievement were circulated on the internet. Thus, recognizing the hard-working individuals who deserve appreciation and recognition from the citizens of the country.
However, there are a few vital aspects that cannot be overlooked in favour of negative aspects that the web and television create in making ordinary individuals popular. It must be admitted that there are few people who commit to awful acts or crimes to appear on television and the internet that makes them well known. This sometimes creates a trouble situation for the families and society.
In conclusion, it can be commented that although there are some negative aspects of the web and television, most of the time it is a positive development which not only assists unfortunate and middle-class people to express their extraordinary qualities and traits but also caters to appreciate and recognize the lesser-known heroes of the nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-10 | Sneha k | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | kushal kushal | 11 | view |
- In many countries, women and men are working full-time. It is therefore logical for women and men to share household chores. To what extent do you agree? Give relevant examples. 67
- Some people think that prison sentences should not be used to deal with criminals Education and skill training should be used instead To what extent do u agree or disagree 81
- Shopping has become a new favorite pastime for younger generations. Why is this the case? Should we encourage them to develop other hobbies too? 73
- Some people think its better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them.Other people believe that it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them 56
- Many people believe that the use of new technology improves the lives of employees.Others think it is a disadvantage for them. Discuss both the view and give youropinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ir versatile skills to the world, which if found extra-ordinary, caters them to be...
^^
Line 11, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...situation for the families and society. In conclusion, it can be commented that ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34946236559 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98584527341 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494623655914 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.5058306482 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.142857143 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199789813973 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736058303222 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592512170123 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120017034201 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319204564731 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.