In 21st century, the vogue of appointing older generation on the higher and significant designations is gradually declining. But is this kind of revolutionary change advantageous for a company and the society at large? Although, most of the population do not accord with this trend believing that young people are less deserving. However, others do concur with it saying that they have the equal rights to prove themselves. This essay will shed some light on both the perspectives while presenting my own bird's eye view in the end of it.
To embark upon, old people possess one paramount and unparalleled quality i.e. " Experience" It is no exaggeration to state that this elite has incomparable comprehension of the system, organisation and the whole milieu due to their association with it for longer period of time. Hence, they are certainly capable of anticipating possible threats or risks in contrast to a fresher. Therefore, they inevitably take good decisions most of the time. Like my father was the Senior Manager of a multi-national company. Once, the owner of it desired to buy few stocks of another company to which my father objected. Eventually, those shares were not bought but after few weeks they came to know that those shares have diminished a lot and this way, the company was saved from a huge loss.
In contrast, youth too has plenty of virtues to offer such as excitement, enthusiasm, technique, new creative ideas and most importantly passion to achieve great heights which compels them to work harder. I can give my own example to illustrate this statement. When I started my first job, I was quite confident and electrified with the thought of implementing brilliant concepts in reality. Therefore, it made me perform diligently and consistently.
Conspicuously, I would like to mention assertively that the benefits of providing opportunities to young generation far outweigh any negative repercussions as it will surely uplift the development. Nonetheless, as I aforementioned, it is highly recommended to gain some experience before accepting big challenges in life by working under the tutelage of a successful elder person.
- You have lost an item of value on train Write a letter to the railway company In your letter Describe the item Explain where and when you left it Say what action you would like the company to take 91
- Essay topics: TOPIC # 31 Some people spend their entire lives in one place. Others move a number of times throughout their lives, looking for a better job, house, community, or even climate. Which do you prefer: staying in one place or moving in search of 76
- You arranged to visit a friend in England but an important event at home now means that you must change the dates of visit Write a letter to your friend In your letter Explain the important Apologize for the situation Suggest a new arrangement 77
- It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries. Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? Give your opinion and relevant examples from your experience. 91
- On a recent holiday you lost a valuable item. Fortunately, you have travel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost. Write a letter to the manager of insurance company. In your letter• Describe the item you lost• Explain how you lost it• Tell th 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...to their association with it for longer period of time. Hence, they are certainly capable of a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or Manager of a multi-national company. Once, the owner of it desired to buy few sto...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, kind of, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23209169054 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16922801433 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647564469914 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4831678657 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.411764706 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0273330497088 0.244688304435 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00812998358417 0.084324248473 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.015261491718 0.0667982634062 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0150822504672 0.151304729494 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00928108924994 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.