Nowadays many people prefer to seek medical advice on internet instead of seeing a qualified doctor, what are the reason for it.
There is no denying fact that the phenomenon of searching medical advice on the internet has been Ubiquitous across the globe due to its paramount importance. One school of thought opines that is worthless however, others consider that a couple of problems also occur because of the same. Although this has a plethora of merits, numerous demerits are also there will be elaborated in upcoming paragraph.
Initiating with the best possible benefits the most significant advantage is the knowing through about the general condition of any diseases. It is easier to search according to the characteristics of any disease condition. To exemplify, in order to find for any dermatological disease, images and video dips are available to determine about the disease. Along with that people can identify the disease common causes, so it is possible to rectify the causes by their own, if it is a minor condition. So no need to waste money on consulting. As a result, it is irrefutable that finding a medical help on internet is an advantageous to some extent.
On the paradoxical side, there are many drawbacks as well first and foremost, people cannot fully rely on internet to banking on. Since various information’s are given in different sites in which some are fake. This incorrect information’s would create unnecessary aggravations which may lead to another disease. For instance, when a person has a mass or any protrusion that could not able to palpable on google that need to be examine by doctor. Secondly, it is entirely different in theoretical as well as practical side. Only practical side of a mass could be measured by using a medical equipment is necessary when comes to operation that would take a doctor’s opinion. Consequently, learning upon theoretical side is not indispensable.
To conclude, without any doubt this is a mixed bag. In this topic has many positives than the negative points of this notion may not be under estimable.
- Online currencies have become more common in recent years Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 89
- You have been living in a rental apartment for the past year Recently a new neighbour moved in and has been making a lot of noise which disturbs you Write a letter to the landlord In your letter explain the situation describe why it bothers you suggest a 78
- Some people spend a lot of money for their wedding ceremonies However others feel like it is unnecessary to spend a lot Discuss both viewpoints and give your own opinion 76
- Some people think that children should start primary school later in life others think that they should start it before 7 Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Educating young people is naturally important However some think governments ought to invest more on education for adults in need To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t fully rely on internet to banking on. Since various information’s are given in diff...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'medical equipment'.
Suggestion: medical equipment
...de of a mass could be measured by using a medical equipment is necessary when comes to operation th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06501547988 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00282466618 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582043343653 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0899771665 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8888888889 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122713851767 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308602733404 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403963272887 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612684789772 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247775689607 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.