Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?
These days, major people participating in social network activities rather than a face-to-face conversation. In my opinion, although online communities can hinder some disadvantages effects, nevertheless, I believe that virtual networks offer more advantages than drawbacks.
On the one hand, the users need to consider the downside of online communities before deciding to enroll in virtual social. To be honest, the social network is not good for people’s health if they spend hours on digital devices to surf the web like Facebook or Instagram. It will increase eye strain and affect health, for instance, nearsightedness. As far I know, the number of adolescents had problems with eyes about 60%, almost because of using social online platforms, according to a report of the Vietnam government. Consequently, people should limit their time using to keep themselves active and healthy.
However, socialise network has many advantages and plays an important role in contributing a reliable education system such as e-learning or distance learning. More recently, virtual learning has emerged as a perfect tool for the same traditional education system, which does not confine its students inside four walls. Besides, it provides knowledge through an e-learning tool, that can operate an open sky or wherever an individual feels comfortable without a location or geographical gap, as one can endure a classroom environment at home with an e-learning tool. Furthermore, socialising online is an attempt to recreate real world socialising. Because people often maintain existing relationships on network platforms by instant connecting with friends or family. For example, people could update their status on social networks and check out the information of their timelines, even share experiences in the lockdown life whenever they want. Therefore, socialise network has been occupying an indestructible space in various fields.
In conclusion, people could not negate some negatives of connecting community networks, but they cannot only lack these connections but also support the civilized development of the online communities because of its benefits.
- The best way to tackle the problem of obesity is to educate people about healthy eating To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- One of the biggest problems facing the world today is growing enough food to feed the ever expanding population Genetically modified foods are the best way to solve this issue To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face Is this a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66975308642 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08400368397 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66049382716 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3662052646 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.466666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188773627889 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609596088909 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712195217135 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129120595866 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824444983918 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.