Nowadays most developing countries receive financial aid from international organizations. However, many people believe that help in a form of advice and skill is more important and useful than money. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
Since the globalization has opened the doors of opportunities for everyone, many countries have come together to support the needy countries in terms of finance and knowledge by constituting world organizations like World bank. Many intellectuals welcome the idea of providing support in terms of capital while others favor the assistance in terms of skill and advice from international organizations. However, In my view that both, finance and guidance, are equally important for thriving countries in their development projects.
Firstly, countries those are in need of development, are generating a very low gross national product which depicts highly deficit economy. Financial support only can fill the fuel in poor economic condition to put the first milestone of any development project. To illustrate, countries like Ghana and Bangladesh where people are living on a hand to mouth, the government would require the cash inflow to revive the economy and to handle the projects like poverty removal through generating more jobs, education system set up and so on. Moreover, observation shows that the slow influx of money and the beast of corruption gulps the huge portion of the loan granted. Still, whatever money is injected into the system can serve the purpose of project accomplishment to a certain extent.
On the other hand, skill and advice from the international bodies are carrying huge importance due to the fact of two for tango. In absence of knowledge and guidance, the maximum portion of finance can fall into the drain in experimenting ideas. To exemplify, India has recently received a technical assistance and operational guidance from Japan for the development of fastest public transport metro rail. Japan has already built up a strong and successful network of metro rail in their country. Hence, they are well versed in analyzing the array of factors to implement their strategy and providing assistance in developing the same facility for other countries. What is more, skill and advice can channelise the capital for fruitful results minimizing the risk factors of experiments.
To conclude, money and knowledge are reciprocal to each other. I strongly believe combination of both the entity only can generate desirable results in developing countries.
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. 76
- you have recently been employed to work in the foreign country, but you are yet to start. one of your relatives is also interested in going with you and work for the same company. Write a letter to your manager and say,- Tell him about yourself and your 88
- In many countries kids are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. what are your opinion on this. 71
- You recently noticed a local restaurant that was offering a part time job. Write a letter to the restaurant's manager. In your letter ,- Explain that you would like to apply for the job-Give some details of any relevant experience that you have- Specify t 79
- It seems clear that obesity in today s society is to some extent due to the availability of fast food Should governments place a tax on fast food to reduce the amount of fast food consumed 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the fastest'.
Suggestion: of the fastest
...guidance from Japan for the development of fastest public transport metro rail. Japan has ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, in my view, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39275766017 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93004436037 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573816155989 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5643127033 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209616204838 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617587828207 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499977503194 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118627990497 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427357629134 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.