Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
People today are responsible for the waste materials produced. Increasing number of garbages are generated by some sort of human activities which have detrimental effect on the environment. There are several reasons why this is happening and governments can play a vital role to substantially supress this trend.
Rubbish are mainly caused by two factors. First, whenever people buy goods or items from marketplace they receive plastic bags with the item purchased. Moreover, the manufacturers wrap those items with plastic materials. Hence, people are forced to take the waste materials with them which consequently results in a large number of garbages. The next factor contributing to this alarming issue is the attitude of the people. People now are habituated to consuming as well as producing garbages. For instance, they feel easier to use plastic plates and cans for parties and day to day activities as they do not have to do their dishes afterward. Call it their lazyness or them being too busy with their life that they want to produce waste rather than wasting their so called valuable time.
Governments, however, can do a number of things to address this issue. To begin with, governments may force manufacturers to produce their items in reusable cans, bottles or boxes rather than non-reusable plastics. This would mean that the number of plastic garbages would drop drastically. Furthermore, awareness campaigns should be launched so as to enlighten the people about how their activities are degrading the environment and the surroundings they live in. TV programs and street plays would be very helpful in creating awareness among the people. Finally, governments can enforce strict laws against both manufacturers and consumers of plastic materials. This would automatically help in reducing the number of waste materials produced.
In conclusion, while there are several factors that have resulted in large amount of rubbish, governments if act proactively can have huge impact on changing this situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-10 | kayra | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | Muiz Sayeh | 56 | view |
- Universities should develop methods to support students who come from rural and disadvantageous backgrounds. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Universities should develop methods to support students who come from rural and disadvantageous backgrounds. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child's development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion. 61
- Write a letter to a colleague who gave you a book that helped you for a presentation at work You should Describe the presentation Why was it important How did it help you 92
- Write a letter to a colleague who gave you a book that helped you for a presentation at work. You should:Describe the presentationWhy was it importantHow did it help you 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...with them which consequently results in a large number of garbages. The next factor contributing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... awareness campaigns should be launched so as to enlighten the people about how their ac...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37931034483 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87446627778 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576802507837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8255948171 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3157894737 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94736842105 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191121225374 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566556510108 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538638504354 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120479123865 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187359442291 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.