the opinions of the celebrities are more important to younger people than they are to older people?
Since the beginning of this century, people has become more impressed with the celebrities. Famous people nowadays spread their thoughts through the social media. From personal point of view, young people can easily be influenced with their ideas more than older people given that young people tend to watch social media more than older ones, a lot of famous entertainers are young, and most of old people trust their own opinion. Below I will strive to explain my supporting points in more details.
The foremost point, young people have a great accessibility to the social media through the internet; moreover, they can follow celebrities’ accounts on Facebook or Instagram. For example, the youths in Egypt interested in the famous singer Amer Diab, during the previous Egyptian election he supported Abdel Fatah el-sisi, likewise lots of his fans voted to the same candidate. However, their parents did not know Amer Diab’s point of view, because they do not have Facebook. Consequently, youth tend to be influenced by the famous entertainers more than old people.
Coupled with, young people watch public media more, lots of famous entertainers and athletes are young another reason for their great influential on youths and teenagers. For example, the Liverpool footballer Mohamed Salah is an icon and role model for young people in Egypt, because he embodies the ideal of a young person who has achieved his dreams. Furthermore, people are interested more to people who fall in their own age. Therefore, younger person care about celebrities’ opinion more than older people.
Finally, old people believe that they are wise enough to trust their own points of views. Given that they have lived more in this world, they have more experience. A survey conducted by Psychological National Association center in California found that older people did not listen to what celebrities thought of a specific subject. Provided that old people do not trust celebrities, they will not be influenced with their opinion. As a result, celebrities’ thoughts are not important to the older people.
Taking everything into a consideration, without a doubt famous entertainers’ opinion are more significant to younger people. It is suggested to guide teenagers how to interpret celebrities’ influence to focus in the positive impacts.
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 70
- tpo 41 new regulations for handling and storing coal ash 73
- in modern life young people should have the ability to plan and organize 86
- do you agree or disagree. It is better for children to choose jobs that are simmiler to their parents' job than choose jobs that are very different from their parnents' jobs. Use specific resons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and example to support your answer. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, therefore, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35849056604 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97075640139 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514824797844 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3576949729 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.631578947 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5263157895 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466688429956 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148662929656 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959598745819 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267807368231 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114602800016 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.