The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

07/04/2018 - 02:31

It is true that, the problem of pollution and traffic jams is escalating at a rapid pace. So, it is suggested that each family should own a single car to tackle this issue. I agree with the given statement as this contributes greatly by saving time, money and health of people.
Firstly, such an approach helps to reduce traffic congestions. If each house have only one car, then the number of motor vehicles racing on the roads decrease. This prevents the unnecessary wastage of time while one is struck in traffic jams. Moreover, car pooling can help the family to escape from the maintainance charges of an extra vehicle. The Canadian government, for instance, introduced the law of one car for four people. The enforcement of this law reduced the traffic congestions by 60% in one year and thus, this approach can be of great assistance to handle the issue.
Furthermore, owning too many cars cause more pollution. As every individual likes to travel in their personal vehicle, they might drive to work alone in a car which can carry at least three more people. This will lead to surplus emission of smoke by motor vehicles which, otherwise, is preventable. Additionally, pollution possess a potential health hazard as several individuals have trouble in breathing and suffer from other skin allergies because of it. The example is of Nigerian government who was able to decrease the pollution levels by about 30% by promoting car pooling. This approach also reduced the respiratory problem of the residents significantly. Therefore, such a trend is a tested measure to reduce the levels of pollution.
To conclude, authorities can enact the law of owning one car per family. This can help greatly to deal with such problems easily and wisely.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
07/04/2018 - 02:31 It is true that, the problem of pollutio...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, while, at least, for instance, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00337837838 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7468433618 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597972972973 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5206560869 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.2777777778 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200981211628 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618550106924 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428859990546 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117264651637 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466986923812 0.056905535591 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.