Well, a human being is gauged by his Knowledge. Preserving the knowledge and sharing with people is very essential.
On one hand, storing and sharing knowledge through books is a traditional approach. Ancient scholars have used this way as their medium of information. 'Authenticity' can be one of the major factors, as the references and the copyright of their work is accounted.
Having said that, writing down books is a time-consuming process as lot of manual intervention is required to reach them to its end users. Also, the search operation is complex if we are precisely looking for a piece of text, even though the information is present in it. Besides them, to make papers, millions of trees are curtailed every year causing serious effect to our ecosystem.
On the other hand, since the technology has grown immensely when compared to past, the usage of internet has become more convenient. It is easy to store and spread our work through various websites or blogs or forums. One can access it easily in no time. Now-a-days, 'Internet' is considered as the quickest medium of information to people. Also, writing, reading and searching through internet for any information is on finger tips to any computer literate.
On contrary, like every coin has both the sides, even the Internet storing has some cons. 'Reliability' is one of the major concerns as their work is not referenced. Also, it is impossible to access without an internet connection.
In a nutshell, sharing and storing on the Internet has the greater advantages when compared to books. So, I opine with the given statement.
- In the past, people like to store knowledge in books. At present, we like to store on the internet. Do you think advantages out-weight the disadvantages? 80
- In the past, people like to store knowledge in books. At present, we like to store on the internet. Do you think advantages out-weight the disadvantages? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, so, then, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81745540504 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591760299625 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8904875685 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.1666666667 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8333333333 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186557741063 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505486479278 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644408302904 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916034057351 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479219676528 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.