People have to spend more and more time to travel from their homes for jobs and study. what are the reasons? How can we solve this problem?
It is indubitable that commuting time for study and work has increased over the past few decades. This essay intends to summarize some of the reason behind this situation and tries to alleviate the problem.
The most obvious reason for this is the traffic congestion, as the number of cars on the roads rises unprecedented over the past decade. It seems that everyone relies on their privacy and comfort, as a result, traffic moves in a snail’s pace. What used to take 10 minutes earlier, takes about 30 minutes now. The second reason is the Suburbanization of the cities. People are now moving to suburbs for quieter, cheap and open houses, as a consequence travel time to office and study skyrocketed.
The solution is not easy, a joint effort with the government should be taken to reduce the gravity of the issue. At the government level, steps could be taken to promote the use of public transport. This could be done by increasing the comfort, frequency and rate cutters with subscription packages. People should be motivated to use car-pooling, even they should be given dedicated tracks. This makes the traffic move quickly. For examples, countries like the USA, India is now emerging with a new idea of promoting “High Occupancy Vehicle” tracks where the rapid movement of vehicles is possible. As survey results on these countries show a boom in depending on public transport.
Furthermore, Individuals have to adopt this as a responsibility. They should voluntarily use public transport even when they are bound by the time of trains and buses. Car-pooling should be done by conscious effort. For example, my friend Abhimanyu who resides in Delhi have to travel 75 km to reach his office in Gurgaon. He approached his neighbourhood to use carpooling to reach the same destination. Not only they save time by reducing the number of vehicles in road and congestion but also had some savings too.
To sum up, it is undeniable that commuting time has increased, but some steps can be followed to ameliorate the situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-03 | Mayuresh Patoliya | 67 | view |
- The number of TV programs is growing day by day Some people say it is good as it gives people more choices while others say it affects the quality of TV programs Discuss both the views and give your opinion 87
- Money offered for postgraduate research is limited As a consequence some people argue that financial support from the government should only be provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects Do you agree or disagree 89
- Write a letter to apply for a part time job in a new international company you have heard about the position from someone in your neighbourhood 77
- All over the world people watch foreign films much more than locally produced films Why Should the government provide financial support to local film industries 67
- More and more people are using the internet to do their tasks rather than doing in person e g banking shopping hotel booking etc Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ecades. This essay intends to summarize some of the reason behind this situation and tries ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rapid movement of vehicles is possible. As survey results on these countries show ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, second, so, for example, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99122807018 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82413912066 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3310174278 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2857142857 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2857142857 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38095238095 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151444657226 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428583478486 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434223340596 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874738349486 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555844751643 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.