People naturally resist making changes in their lives. What kinds of problems can this cause? What solutions can you suggest?
Continuous transformation is a part of life in our world. It is true that humans don’t want to embrace changes in their personal or professional life. Changing something in our life has both benefits and drawbacks. This essay will discuss the issues caused due to this and remedies to overcome this psychological nature of human beings.
To begin with, resisting to transform will have some major adverse situations. Firstly, life would become monotonous if people are going through the same experience on a regular basis. This will negatively affect people and finally they lose motivation. Secondly, professional cannot progress in their career if they do not embrace change. To demonstrate, an interesting report published by Chase Corporation reveals that more than fifty percent of their employees in middle management level are reluctant to take up higher positions. Thus, we can see that opposing change will negatively impact both our personal and professional fronts.
So, are there any remedies to overcome this psychological barrier? The answer is yes. One of the solutions would be worth trying to change minor aspects in life such as cuisine or attire. This will give a hint of what it would be like to do things differently. Secondly, it will greatly help while making new choice by carefully evaluating it’s benefits and drawbacks. This will ensure that we will not end up putting something at risk. For example, I took a firm decision to take up a new employment after weighing pros and cons, which, gave me the opportunity to progress in my career.
In summary, it is quite natural for most people to be afraid of doing things differently which makes our lives uninteresting. However, by applying simple solutions, we can make it exciting and more meaningful.
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy Which opinion do you agree with Discuss both options and give examples 84
- Do you have to plan for the future Or stay focused on our present What is your opinion and why Provide examples to support your stand 81
- Some people think that with combined effort on the part of government and society crime can be completely eradicated while others argue that this is completely hypothetical and that crime has always been present in societies even in ancient times Compare 80
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'resisting transforming'.
Suggestion: resisting transforming
...ture of human beings. To begin with, resisting to transform will have some major adverse situations...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in summary, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15753424658 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88031411831 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626712328767 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4333017187 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2631578947 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3684210526 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209188489895 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543884235406 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039906232395 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121672101207 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169330956769 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.