Prevention is better than cure. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventive measures.
To what extent do you agree?
Investing in preventive measures is relatively cost effective, whereas an exorbitant amount of money is spent on exploring and treating diseases. So, it is considered that taking proactive steps in preventing diseases is better than curing them. In my opinion, I completely agree that investing in preventive measures is better than investing in treatment.
On the one hand, the amount of money spent on treatment is extortionate, whereas only a small fraction of this investment is involved in preventive measures. Being ready in advance with measures for upcoming diseases helps to cut down a lot of cost which, consequently, can be used in other developmental activities. For example, in 2009, during the outbreak of swine flu, citizens of countries like India were vaccinated in advance and hence most of them were rescued from this disease. As a result, the funds saved were used in improvising the infrastructure of the country.
On the other hand, being proactively ready with preventive measures also helps the poor section of the society. Certain life-threatening diseases, for instance, dengue is more prevalent in the rural areas. Poor people are more prone to these diseases. Furthermore, it is difficult for them to afford the treatment and as a result a major portion of their earning is spent in curing them. But, if they are well informed about the precautions required to save them from these diseases, a huge amount can be saved , and this can be used by them in improving their lifestyle.
In conclusion, investing money in preventive measures is better than investing in treatment of diseases as it helps in saving money which can otherwise be used in development of the country. Also, poor section of the society can use this money in improving their standard of living.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-11 | kanchan Mathur | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | kanchan Mathur | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-27 | Revathi A | 78 | view |
- In the last 20 years there have been significant developments in the field of information technology (IT), for example World Wide Web & communication by email. However future developments in IT are likely to have more negative effects than positive.To 84
- people sleep less than before in many countries why people sleep less what effect does it have individually and in society 81
- In many countries, the rich are becoming richer and poor are becoming poorer.Why is this a problem?What solutions are there to tackle this problem? 67
- Prevention is better than cure. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventive measures.To what extent do you agree? 67
- people sleep less than before in many countries why people sleep less what effect does it have individually and in society 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 511, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ese diseases, a huge amount can be saved , and this can be used by them in improvi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12925170068 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95145828431 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496598639456 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.732890486 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24515767614 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962287084766 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108738167947 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180502873403 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131090894889 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.