The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicines. Government funding should reflect this. To what extent to you agree or disagree?
Health problems among people have multiplied over the years. It is argued that government sparing enough funds to tackle them before it effects is more effective than remedying it, I agree to this statement. This essay will discuss the different methods that could be employed in the battle against diseases.
To begin with, there is ample evidence that onus of Promotion and creating awareness among people about the risk of encountering problems in their life span is on government. The central reason for this, it allows people to be conscious of the ailment and take necessary steps. Related campaigns either by public bodies or non profit entities should be duly encouraged by allotting enough corpus. To illustrate this, HIV was highest in 1970’s across the globe. Despite not having an antidote, with safety precautions rigorously advocated by all the political parties in form of hoardings and making the essentials available at cheaper rate and accessible everywhere, the world was able to minimize the virus drastically. Therefore it is conclusively clear that even for the incurable, awareness about its spread and prevention, can reduce the risk of being affected.
Secondly, the people in power could also drill down to the root of the issue and eradicate it at source to minimalize the spread. This is an expensive approach as it requires research and infrastructure for the execution of the potential solution. For example, virus such as dengue and malaria are now restricted to only third world countries as developed nations were able to eradicate it by keeping their surroundings clean and timely maintenance by fogging and pest control enabled the public agencies put a stop to it. Thus it is possible to state that cutting it at the source by various techniques at large scale is one way to cure it.
In conclusion, although there are vaccines and solutions for many diseases and ailments, prevention is the only option for the rest of them. To ensure it is carried out extensively, government should advertise and deploy necessary equipment to curb it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-15 | ghostwriter | 89 | view |
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets and there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema 84
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one Give reasons for your answer include any examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- Many people join distance learning programmes study material post TV Internet and study at home but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does 89
- More and more prisons are being built to house the world s criminals and many people believe long term imprisonment is the answer to solving the crime problem However oth ers feel that psychological assistance is what is required Discuss both views and gi 78
- Nowadays a few people take their family with them abroad whenever they go on a business trip Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion To what extent do you support this development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: IN_1990s[2]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1970’s'.
Suggestion: in the 1970’s
...us. To illustrate this, HIV was highest in 1970’s across the globe. Despite not having an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 722, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...able to minimize the virus drastically. Therefore it is conclusively clear that even for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...d the public agencies put a stop to it. Thus it is possible to state that cutting it...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13823529412 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77583959679 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620588235294 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.163218618 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.466666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119509256674 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392617142509 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477787715538 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812564482612 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698444618676 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.