Recent advancements in technology have made TV screen so live that people do not feel the need to go for live performances (eg. live shows or concerts). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Tremendous changes have been made in people's life due to the improvements in the field of technology. This reduced the participation in live shows by human, as it is now possible to watch through television with enhanced quality. I completely agree with the notion as these equipments are introduced with most modern facilities and, moreover it provides a flexible timing.
The foremost thing to hold the aforementioned part is that, the new televisions are produced with modern amenities to have a good quality view. For instance, many contemporary tv sets have three-dimensional displays, curvy screen to avoid the effect of watching from home and so on. Thereby, people are less likely to go for a live program, as they get better quality vision from house itself, without spending money on tickets, food, beverages and so on.
What is more, the modern sets and some cable dishes have the provision to set time of the programs. Since mankind have been leading a busy life nowadays, some might not have enough time to view the programs when they are on air. Yet, to compete that, a facility is introduced by many channel providers. To cite an example, a dish company named big tv, have the option to pause the programs and could be viewed whenever indeed. Therefore, these means make man away from the live stage shows.
In conclusion, along with the mitigation of human interactions, these advancements in technology played a vital role in reducing the participation of people in stage shows. I hope in future people would realize the importance of live shows.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-18 | Neenu martin | 88 | view |
| 2018-11-14 | arunpaul | 78 | view |
- You are staying in rented accommodation You recently held a party to celebrate your birthday Several neighbours have complained about the noise to your landlord Write a letter to your landlord In your letter apologize for the disturbance explain the situa 70
- Recent advancements in technology have made TV screen so live that people do not feel the need to go for live performances eg live shows or concerts To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- You are currently living in a rented flat but will be moving out soon Write a letter to the owner of the flat to thank him and introduce one of your friends to move in In your fetter you should thank the owner of the flat for being so nice and helpful exp 55
- you were on a pleasant trip and had rented a flat from your friend who was on a holiday. Write a letter to your friend and in your letter writ him:>how you felt about the trip and>how did you take care of his house in his absence. 73
- You have just moved into a new home and are planning to hold a party. You are worried that the noise may disturb your neighbour.Write a letter to your neighbour. In your letter.1. Introduce yourself2. Describe your plans for the party3. invite your neighb 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in peoples life due to the improvements in the field of technology. This reduced...
^^
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith most modern facilities and, moreover it provides a flexible timing. The fo...
^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n they are on air. Yet, to compete that, a facility is introduced by many channel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98098859316 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81893458064 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623574144487 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9117229934 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.769230769 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216493219559 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699362056021 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438737601896 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124915384914 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237163810254 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.