Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and provide relevant examples from your own experience.
The damage to the environment is increasing at an alarming rate. even though the great efforts are now being made by officials around the world, individuals have to play an integral part in avoiding future disasters.
To begin with, one of the major reason of this raise is the pollution which is being produced by uncontrolled use of automobiles. In addition, people are also destroying forests which are the best source of producing oxygen. As a result, the world is experiencing steady increments in global temperature. if individuals start to rely on public transports and plants tree then the world might be saved from further destruction.
Another reason to blame for this situation is the heavy use of plastic products. it is indestructible therefore it is irrefutable fact that plastic is harmful even though it provides convenience. The use of plastic products are banned by many governments, however, individuals and companies are utilising it on a regular basis. if people stop to use such products then it might not only save the environment but might also be helpful to increase land space because of heavy usage governments nowadays have to make space for storing.
Authorities seem to become ignorant after firming rules for improvement. In other words, Once the rule is made they do not evaluate if it is being obeyed by citizens and businesses or not. Instead of this trend if they make sure to provide proper guidelines and regulations which stats disciplinary actions for the one which might be taken who do not compile with it.
To recapitulate, Problems related to the environment could not be solved by individuals or government on their own but by joining forces situation could be improved.
- You recently traveled on a train which arrived very late, and then you faced many problems. Write a letter to the owner of the company. In your letter, you should tell: - Where you were going - What problems you faced - What action you would like the owne 73
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and provide relevant examples from your own experience. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...ment is increasing at an alarming rate. even though the great efforts are now being ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...teady increments in global temperature. if individuals start to rely on public tra...
^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...n is the heavy use of plastic products. it is indestructible therefore it is irref...
^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...es are utilising it on a regular basis. if people stop to use such products then i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, in addition, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05281690141 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92802598069 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5730004726 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129908273175 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417259339635 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242350751715 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689793840796 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198378657604 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.