Science gives people life expectancies of close to 100 years or even more. Some people view it in a positive light but others believe it creates some problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Over last few decade, we are blessed with the enormous growth of science. Form the standpoint of few folks innovation or development has an array of positivity in it to bring progress in human being. In other hand, others are strongly supported that over expectation from science may lead to different or abrupt problems. This essay will discuss both positive as well as negative points with the aid of my strong and supportive opinion.
Let's check out the plus viewpoints of it. In my opinion, it is quiet natural to think bigger as we are privileged by science and its boundless aliveness in order to fight against any disease. Firstly, in current era, mankind can celebrate the assistance of highly organized and improved system to cure cancer. For example, medical science is assuring people to get cure.So that people can keep looking for hope which was not possible few years back. Secondly, folks of this Earth can think of to reach high and touch sky through the incredible progression of technology. As an instance, getting an 360 degree view of any planet is quiet natural nowadays. People can hope to bring the next 1000 years by holding the hand of technology.
Coming to the negative effects, I would like to say over use of anything can affect badly. Firstly, we can say that one has to knowledgeable enough to continue with the technical part to use it appropriately. Nuclear power can be the best example of it. Using such life taking energy requires ene to end information to carry it successfully at the end. Secondly, one must know how to keep up every part of it is crucial to keep it for long-term. Otherwise, it also leads to destroy the entire mankind.
In conclusion, if we dig into beginning of science and innovation there was good as well as bad effect unless one has complete information to save it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | SharmisthaNaskar | 84 | view |
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 89
- Write about the following topic Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor What are some of the reasons for world poverty How can the poor be helped Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant ex 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 67
- You are planning a short visit to a city where one of your relatives lives Write a letter to your relative In your letter Explain when and how long you will be in town Ask whether you can stay at their home Offer to pay for yourself 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun decade seems to be countable; consider using: 'few decades'.
Suggestion: few decades
Over last few decade, we are blessed with the enormous growt...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'folks'' or 'folk's'?
Suggestion: folks'; folk's
... of science. Form the standpoint of few folks innovation or development has an array ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
.... This essay will discuss both positive as well as negative points with the aid of my stro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... my strong and supportive opinion. Lets check out the plus viewpoints of it. In...
^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
... science is assuring people to get cure.So that people can keep looking for hope w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77742946708 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65354159686 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601880877743 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4279352974 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6666666667 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125838816997 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329438735356 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432917231487 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0646490026801 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498434547897 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.