Scientist predict that all people will chose to talk the same global language in the future.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It is believed that speaking in one common language is galvanizing, but it could bring up insurmountable of conundrums and affect the traditions, cultures as well. As we know having a common language is easy to visualize but difficult to cope with. In addition, there will be more negative consequences than positive effects.
The diversity of the world has its own majestic and conflating various phenomena will cause a convoluted place on this world. Since the very beginning of the evolution of human being had several languages with cultures and they had lived with this tremendously and still there are some extant tribes existing phenomenally. However, there were some blood and tears with the wars in the past centuries but it was the impact of disparities and lack of confluences.
Moreover, the existence of enormous of language entirely soaked up with religions, tradition and cultures. Bringing a new modification on language could annihilate all of these beliefs and will arise a gigantic turmoil. Therefore, a lot of wars and destruction could be occurred easily.
On the contrary, using a common language could bring familiarity and complacent for the people and eradicating of barriers between the countries would converge the people and build the global laws for everybody.
In conclusion, taking a decision on something is just a process of emerging something new but executing the notion in reality is completely unprecedented until we visualize it early. Consequently, we just have to embrace the virtue of lives as it is and it will fulfil us with blissfulness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-19 | insidematrix | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | insidematrix | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | insidematrix | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | gillmandeep0260 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | insidematrix | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.203125 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04466065368 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9646603381 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145962746143 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504728468467 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432471759268 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763262794258 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320888055381 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.