Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Scientists believe that next generation will use one global language to interact with each other. While this tendency has many disadvantages, I still believe it is a positive development.
On the one hand, the downsides of this trend cannot be overlooked. The dominance of having single language will gradually eliminate the linguistic diversity in many countries across the world, which is a principal cause for cultural absorption. Younger generations may undervalue their language, resulting in an irreparable destruction of the traditions, culture, and identity of their own. For example, tourists visiting China will not be able to relish the rich historical heritage of Chinese language and culture.
On the other hand, this offers many practical benefits to society as a whole. First, a universal language will give an enormous amount of opportunities to people to integrate into a global working environment which is essential for globalization. With no language barriers, people will not only communicate freely with their foreign business partners but also have a golden opportunity to work for a multi-national corporation in any part of the world. This would enable them to enjoy decent living standards, positively affecting the economic expansion of the country. Secondly, world’s history will be available in one language for free or by paying a minimal amount. This would solicit knowledge sharing and expansion across the globe for academic purposes.
To sum up, it is clear that there are drawbacks of the trend. I think that having one universal language is important for humanity’s development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-01 | Glenn20sal | 63 | view |
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most a 77
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 55
- More and more are moving away from an agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work What will be consequences of this What solutions can you offer 73
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university. Some people believe that the year off is a waste of time while others believe that it is necessary.Choose which position you most agree with and discu 83
- “Vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat.”Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.Write between 200 and 300 words. 38
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l benefits to society as a whole. First, a universal language will give an enormo...
^^
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lobalization. With no language barriers, people will not only communicate freely ...
^^
Line 4, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tners but also have a golden opportunity to work for a multi-national corporation...
^^
Line 4, column 584, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mic expansion of the country. Secondly, world's history will be available i...
^^
Line 6, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be for academic purposes. To sum up, it is clear that there are drawbacks of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, i think, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50996015936 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09889482822 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629482071713 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5376783761 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152437455568 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513145461792 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483572417353 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979195753514 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339536899537 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.