Nowadays, with the steady growth of private schools, it has become a popular topic of debate whether private educational institutions should receive financial grants from state government. However, I firmly disagree with the notions as government should not provide their education funds to private institutions.
Apparently, several reasons advocates that the state government should only give their funds to public schools. First and foremost, the government is not responsible for arranging financial aid to private schools as the admission fees of independent institutions are much higher compared to public schools. Secondly, parents admitting their children in private schools are able to manage funding of private schools by giving donations because only wealthy families can afford private education of their children. Thirdly, the funding of extra-curricular activities in non-government schools comes through the admission extra-curricular activity fee which is also paid by parents. For example, I used to play basketball in school where I completed state and national level championships. My parents paid the coaching fees of my basketball training program where proper training was given by my coach who was a sports teacher in my school. In all the above reasons, the funding is managed by parents to run private schools which are successfully running smoothly in many countries.
If the state government will start helping private schools there will insufficient funds for the government schools. With limited financial aid from the state government, it will be challenging tasks for government academic administrators to hire a good skilled teacher for the charter schools. Also, these teachers expect higher wages, as they work extremely hard to teach pupils as there is at least a strength of 100 students in a class of public educational institutions.
In conclusion, evidently, government should not support private institutional because their funding is arrange by rich parents through huge donations. Hence, government educational funds should be provided to public schools only.
- You have lost something on a bus and called customer service to get help You weren t happy with their response Write a letter to the bus company manager In your letter you should describe the item you lost explain why you weren t happy with the customer s 84
- You recently went to visit a friend in their new home Write a letter to your friend In your letter tell your friend what you liked about his her new house say what you did or enjoyed most about your stay with your friend suggest when and where you could m 78
- You have recently moved into a new house You want to tell your friend about your good news Write to your friend In the letter Describe the house Describe the neighbourhood Invite your friend to come and see the house 95
- Some people think that teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to private institutions. Apparently, several reasons advocates that the state...
^^
Line 2, column 911, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...raining was given by my coach who was a sports teacher in my school. In all the above ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'arranged'.
Suggestion: arranged
... institutional because their funding is arrange by rich parents through huge donations....
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, at least, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68888888889 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05106286905 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6508623948 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263398022315 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107496900701 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540138020462 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173385031005 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223386793578 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.