Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
opinion are divided as to whether affluent societies should support underdeveloped countries by providing them adequate food and education, or it is the government's task to undertake the responsibility of their inhabitant's wellbeing themselves.
It is a widespread belief that the ruling party is responsible for ameliorating their residents' living standards and providing them all essential requirements. However, some undeveloped countries are seen to suffer from the shortage of natural resources whilst lack of fund to invest in education. Therefore, in these cases, wealthy countries should come forward to improve the quality of life in undeveloped countries. By bear in mind ensuring quality education, it is central to end extreme poverty and promote economic growth. As a result, more equal countries performed better on the global peace index, which reflects militarism and violence in which all the world will gain benefits.
Moreover, there is a strong correlation between economic recession and migration form emerging countries. Due to the lack of job opportunities, individuals tend to leave their country of birth or think about emigration. Dire consequences are awaiting such condition such as illegal immigration, one of the pitfalls of illegal immigration is Human smuggling and trafficking by which means is human trafficking committed. It is not uncommon for migrants to die in the process of smuggling.
immigration can bring dire consequences to a wealthy country as well as poor countries. Immigration could lead to some displacement of native-born workers who then experience structural unemployment. For example, if migrants gain unskilled labor because they are willing to work for lower wages. Those native-born low-skilled workers may find it harder to gain new employment in higher-skilled occupations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-11 | apurvparekh30 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-30 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-30 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-27 | ankita.hpgdc | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-26 | Agni | 89 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 73
- Some people say that government should not put money into building theatres and sports stadium they should focus on medical care and education To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Cam13test1task2 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Opinion
opinion are divided as to whether affluent soci...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
opinion are divided as to whether affluent societies should support under...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Immigration
...s to die in the process of smuggling. immigration can bring dire consequences to a wealth...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for example, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68363636364 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26423139676 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629090909091 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2981055602 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.642857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0958458307146 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0287477195024 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428846127536 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659174748807 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049975668789 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.