Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Now a day, billions of dollars are being disbursed as an aid to the poorer nations every year by the first world countries like USA, China, Japan, Germany and France. Some people believe that these nations should share their wealth to assist poorer nations by providing food and education to their people. Whereas, some refute this statement and think that the governments of third world countries should look after their citizens themselves. Both points of view will be discussed in order.
On the one hand, It can be said that the poorer nations depict worrisome situation of food, shelter and education. Therefore, it is the moral as well as ethical responsibility of the wealthy nations having tremendous resources to aid the people of poorer nations. Moreover, the citizens of countries like Somalia, Ethiopia and Malawi do not even have enough food to feed the people three times a day. Same is the case with education. Furthermore, according to World Bank's survey. In these countries GDP per capita Income is less than 300$ per annum. As a result, people are dying of hunger. In this scenario, the aid from richer countries becomes mandatory.
On the other hand, it is argued that governments should take their own responsibility to cater the needs of its people rather than depending on aid. In addition, it is proclaimed by some intellectuals that foreign aid means foreign interventions. Consequently, the governments have to pay the cost in the form of weaker sovereignty and integrity. For Instance, Iraq and Libya had gone through the same situations. Above all, the poorer countries may avail the loans from the IMF and World Bank to fulfill their needs of food as well as to inject funds in the education sector. By doing this, they may eradicate poverty with the passage of time.
In a nutshell, according to my opinion the richer countries should support the poorest countries under certain circumstances like flood, famine and earthquake. Whereas, the governments of poorer countries should take responsibility to accommodate the needs of its people and should not heavily rely on aids.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | junaid_sh | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | mspoonam | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | mspoonam | 78 | view |
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior. what do you think are the causes of this ?what solutions can you suggest ? 61
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 73
- you were hurt in a minor accident inside the a super market, and you wish to complain to the supermarket. write a letter to manger of the super market. In your letter1. say who you are2. give details about the accident3. suggest how the supermarket could 84
- Happiness is considered very important in life. why is it difficult to define?what factors are important in achieving happiness? 78
- Some People believe that children’s leisure activities must be educational; otherwise they are a complete waste of time. Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$300'.
Suggestion: $300
...ries GDP per capita Income is less than 300$ per annum. As a result, people are dyin...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'first', 'furthermore', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'well', 'whereas', 'as to', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'as a result', 'as well as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.296675191816 0.247107183377 120% => OK
Verbs: 0.120204603581 0.155533422707 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0613810741688 0.0946595960268 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0383631713555 0.0501214627716 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0358056265985 0.0437548338989 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13810741688 0.122226691241 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0332480818414 0.0403226058552 82% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74879115626 2.80594681477 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0306905370844 0.0326793684256 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.109974424552 0.0861772015684 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0255754475703 0.021408717616 119% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.011925033212 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2113.0 1933.35771543 109% => OK
No of words: 348.0 316.048096192 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07183908046 6.12580529183 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367816091954 0.374742101984 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.252873563218 0.28420135186 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.169540229885 0.203846283523 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146551724138 0.137316102897 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74879115626 2.80594681477 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.037074148 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531609195402 0.56093040696 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 57.0795676211 60.7387585426 94% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0891783567 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.4 20.7743622355 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1795307634 49.517814964 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.65 127.492653851 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7743622355 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.85 0.814263465372 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 42.6873563218 49.1944974215 87% => OK
Elegance: 2.40789473684 1.69124875643 142% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.550297934738 0.332605444948 165% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0795627681412 0.102741220458 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0676755566065 0.0668466124924 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.469960177892 0.534860350844 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.183799499387 0.148594505496 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187704587803 0.134430193775 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126913169117 0.0742795772207 171% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.486598838444 0.324371583561 150% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0620422697983 0.0638462369009 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.392823503997 0.228012699653 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095647302113 0.058150111329 164% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.41683366733 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.