Some believe that it is good having people with extremely high income in the country, while some think government should try to limit it. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Earning gap between the rich and the poor has increased over the recent decades. Although some opine that governing bodies should put a cap over the individual’s earnings which exceed certain thrash-hold, I firmly believe that this approach would have severe consequence for the economy and might hurt public sentiments. This essay will shed light on both opinions and presents writer’s opinion at the end.
Two major categories of wealth generators in contemporary society are the celebrities, such as sports and film stars, and the entrepreneurs. While people often criticize that film stars are earning millions of dollars, there are only few actors who could reach to that stage and majority of others could not get even decent roles for many years. Beside this, there earning is usually linked to the value they add to the projects, as their movies are blockbusters on the box-office. Furthermore, entrepreneurs earn high income because of the value their products add to the society. For instance, because of the products, such as microwave-ovens, washing machines, vacuum cleaners, we have saved a lot of our time and effort already.
However, others believe that income should be caped so that equality could be maintained in the society. I totally disagree with that because if we limit the entrepreneur’s earning, they might stop investing their energy and wealth into the research and development of innovative ideas. This, in long term, is not only detrimental to the economy of the country, but also limits the problem solving products to the community. In addition, if government heavily taxes the celebrities’ incomes, people would lose interest in their favorite professions and might opt for the safer careers. Thus, it is clear that by limiting earnings, how society and country both will suffer.
To conclude, while it seems attractive to limit the earning potential of wealthy individuals of the society, thorough analyses proves that it would not be in the best interest of the people and country as a whole. We should continue to reward our risk takers, so that we can reap the benefits of their efforts in future.
- Recently you saw an article in a newspaper journal about a city town you know and some of the information in the article was incorrect Write a letter to the editor regarding this In your letter you should tell how you know about this city town what inform 73
- It is sometimes said that travel broadens the mind To what extent do you agree or disagree with this Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- A person s health is their own responsibility rather than the government s responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 79
- Write a letter to your friend about a job opportunity you came across that they might find interesting In your letter you should give some details about the job mention how you came across the job opportunity explain why you feel the job would be suitable 78
- Some people believe that children should obey their parents Other however argue that they should think independently Discuss these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... society and country both will suffer. To conclude, while it seems attractive t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... can reap the benefits of their efforts in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e benefits of their efforts in future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18338108883 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80880639325 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590257879656 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6500428229 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.6 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183849438514 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526471442074 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399631333723 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105167851615 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363737006746 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.