It is often argued by some that people are not so much active socially than they used to be in the past because of the technological advancements, whereas others do not agree with this. In my opinion, advanced technologies have resulted in people being not much socially active. This essay with discuss both the views, followed by a reasoned conclusion.
One the one hand, some claim that advanced technology has made people feel isolated and therefore made them socially inactive. This is to say that with the introduction of recent technologies, in particular the Internet, individuals tend to spend a significant amount of their time communicating virtually without the need of face-to-face communication. This has led to curbing of the practice of meeting and socializing with friends and family in real. For example, according to a recent article published in The Times in 2016 revealed that in the UK, 70 percent of people prefer to chat online via various social networking sites to stay in touch, rather than meeting in-person, resulting in loneliness.
On the other hand, some disagree and think that with the advancement in the field of technology, people have become more connected to each other. In other words, the availability of various communication platforms has made it possible to communicate easily and conveniently at the touch of a button. People using these technologies can exchange information and communicate whenever they prefer, resulting in building stronger relationships. For instance, a recent survey conducted by a leading technological company revealed that with the release of various applications each year, people are building effective relationships overseas because of these applications being very user-friendly and interactive.
In conclusion, although with the modernization of technology, people have become more connected, however it has curbed the real interaction between people and resulted in isolation.
- Write a letter to a friend you have borrowed something from your friend and it got damaged. apologise for damaging the production.Explain what happened..Say how are you doing to fix the issue 56
- A friend has written to you asking for advice about a problem at work. you have had a similar problem in the past.write a reply to your friend . In your letter:1. tell your friend you understand the problem.2. explain what happened to you in the past.3. 73
- A friend, who lives in another country, has invited to you come and stay with him/her on your next holiday. You are too busy to accept the invitation. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter: – thank him/her for the invitation – explai 73
- You have recently moved to a new apartment Write a letter to your friend and explain why did you move Describe the new apartment Invite him her to visit 72
- A friend has written to you asking for advice about a problem at work. you have had a similar problem in the past.write a reply to your friend . In your letter:1. tell your friend you understand the problem.2. explain what happened to you in the past.3. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...technology has made people feel isolated and therefore made them socially inactiv...
^^
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sion, although with the modernization of technology, people have become more conn...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51495016611 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18794611127 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564784053156 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3330407296 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227988790703 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906521892559 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610386038911 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140881429215 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549491703299 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.