Nowadays, juveniles are spending their leisure time and holidays in part-time occupation. Some believe that it is benifical for them to start working in their early stage of life, while some suggest that students should focus on studying. This essay will discuss both points of view.
Allowing teenagers to work as an employee is the most direct way to let them grow and build the concept of saving. Currently, students rely heavily on parental care especially in well-developed countries. Apart from the past, they do not need to learn how to budget or save money as their parents and relatives will take care of them once they request. Therefore, spending money that earn themselves teaches them to treasure money instead of wasting it without any purpose. Furthermore, this allows them to adapt to the society once they graduated from high school or tertiary education.
Opposer to this issue hold an opinion that schooling is prior to anything else and it is never too late since they can spend the rest of their life on workplaces. If they received poor academic results due to the excess workload, they will end up by finding a job they are not longing for. However, this essay disagrees with this argument. In theory, juveniles should balance the time they use on studying and working. When they able to do so, they could learn a variety of soft skills, such as communication skill, time management skill and presentation skill through work. These could differentiate them from ordinary students and even those with same level results. For example, University of Cambridge receive thousands of application from top students and this could be the criteria eliminating other candidates.
To conclude, while some nations support teenagers to attend part-time job and some still feels the drawbacks weigh more than benefits. I personally believe student should participate in workspace as long as they could manage their time.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, apart from, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12302839117 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6230165354 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621451104101 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.472395054 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5294117647 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113302890344 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389443653502 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539097862437 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956725921574 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705686492018 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.