In some countries the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

In some countries, the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In recent years, flaunting weapons has become fashion in various nations. Due to possession of firearms in household, cases of shootings are rising day by day. I totally agree with this statement and scrutinize its aspect in the forthcoming paragraphs before venturing a logical conclusion.

Allowing public to keep guns in their home is one of the big reasons behind the violence. This trend not only normalize the weapon culture in the country, but also promote the household crimes. If government allows citizens of its nation to purchase arms without any license, it would be difficult to control the offenses in homes. In countries like America for instance do not have any restrictions on buying ammunition which results in plethora of cases of shooting and assault. Thus, it is essential to impose some restriction on possession of weapons.

Manufacturing and supply of illegal firearms is another point of concern. Though in some reasons obtaining license is a compulsion before buying weapons but some unlawful trading of guns give access to everyone to buy it. Uttar Pradesh of India is the best example of producing and supplying illegal armaments in most of the areas of northern India. Despite various strict actions by the police, culprits are selling the guns illegal without any fear.
Possession of firearms in almost every house is a matter of concern in conclusion. Availability of guns for everyone should be restricted which can be achieved with the efforts of government and the concerned authorities. There is a long way to keep situation under control however some countries have already achieved that. Imposing fines and penalties on unnecessary usage of weapons can be another way to stop overuse of it.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-01 heyimmehak@gmail.com 89 view
2022-08-01 aman kola 89 view
2022-08-01 heyimmehak@gmail.com 89 view
2022-08-01 heyimmehak@gmail.com 78 view
2022-08-01 aman kola 78 view
Essays by user aman kola :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77951985009 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2284882094 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.0625 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8125 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13375523315 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378783691831 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420744554622 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0740817628434 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300829773631 0.056905535591 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.