In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today's world?
Some country’s elementary school curriculum includes basic education on variety of subjects while in other countries, elementary students only study selected subjects with in-depth focus. It is a debatable issue that, whether the general education or specific education is deemed more suitable for secondary students. I believe that former education system is better for the students. In this essay, I will discuss the benefits of both the systems and provide supportive statements that proves general education system for range of subjects is superior to other.
Let’s start with the benefits of general education. This system will offer brief knowledge about different subjects therefore, students could choose their further course of study from variety of courses they studied and they can choose their best-loved subject as majors. Moreover, if student have knowledge about different subject area, he could enhance this knowledge at university level, which could be very difficult if he had not studied that subject at all. Another significant benefit is that, a student who have diversified subject knowledge can guide his younger siblings or friends, which subject to focus more or which subject is harder to get through or interesting subjects. In short, student could help others only if he had familiarity about course.
On the other side, studying limited number of subjects with detailed knowledge is also beneficial. This could make their foundation strong, hence students could score splendidly at college education. Also this system will release a lot of burden from students as lesser number of course books means lesser studies, lesser number of exams and lesser classes as well. It also requires more professional teachers with true knowledge about the stream, so that they can mentor the children exceptionally in that particular field.
In conclusion, I believe that, although focused studies with fewer number of subjects has its own advantages such as less burden on children and teachers, thorough knowledge about subjects but learning basic knowledge about various subjects is more fruitful. Study of variety of courses gives more opportunities to students to explore and select their best interested subject at college. In short ‘being jack of all trades and master of none’ is more beneficial these days.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-08 | harmankaur | 59 | view |
- some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional area outside large urban centers. Do you think advantage outweigh disadvantages. 89
- Many people make friends through social sites and chat rooms. Others believe that it is not a good idea to make friends without meeting them face to face. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant examples. 84
- Write a letter to the local planning committee A new swimming pool is about to be built in your town the local planning committee wants all residents to let them know where to place the pool in the centre of town or just outside the town Write a letter de 61
- With the increased global demand for oil and gas, some people believe that undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Is it advantageous or disadvantageous? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... score splendidly at college education. Also this system will release a lot of burde...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in short, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50552486188 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68636857334 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530386740331 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3935168495 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5625 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197654258075 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702855072378 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549047665321 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129819695088 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756274627852 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.