Some countries spend a lot of money to make bicycle usage easier. why is this ? is this the best solution ?
It is an unquestionable fact that, with the increase in urbanization people are becoming more ambitious towards motor vehicles. Keeping the future of environment in mind, governments are promoting and spending huge amount on bicycle usage, especially to make it easier. But, is this a best solution? This essay will discuss why nations are doing this and whether there is an alternative apart from this proposition.
One of the most prominent reasons for countries spending money on making bicycle usage convenient is, it won’t concern environment. As bicycle uses human energy to run, it will not produce smoke and will not only eradicate carbon foot-prints caused by that person but also save energy. Furthermore, it will cut traffic on roads. Bikes are normally small which will occupy much space on roads; therefore, it won't cause traffic congestions. One more point worth considering is, cycling is a best mode to exercise and compared to working out in a gym, pedaling with nature will increase the oxygen levels in the blood and help to live healthier and stronger. These are the ultra prominent reason to invest money on usage of bikes.
Experts suggest there are many alternatives that could be done in spite of squandering huge money on cycles. A good public transport which is powered by electricity can, as it will generate income and provides some returns for the investments. On top of that wider roads will reduce traffic jams and increase the convenience to manage traffic. In addition to that investing in research and development of eco motors will encourage the people discover new corners of modern machinery and will help the environment by shunning pollution. To put it other way, these are some of the alternatives that could be used in the place of bicycles.
On the whole, although, use of bicycles will reduce the issue of pollution and traffic to some extent, in my opinion I stand on the side of experts to vote for the alternatives as a better solution including cycling
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-13 | Glenn20sal | 11 | view |
- Your neighbors have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house/ flat.Write a letter to your neighbors. In your letterExplain the reasons for the noiseApologizeDescribe what action you will take 73
- Some people encourage Development of factory farming and the scientific creation of fruits and vegetables in agriculture but others oppose these developments Discuss both views and give your own opinion 74
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food that throws away? 84
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged for use by some countries. To what extent is this a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ecially to make it easier. But, is this a best solution? This essay will discuss ...
^
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... point worth considering is, cycling is a best mode to exercise and compared to w...
^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...llution. To put it other way, these are some of the alternatives that could be used in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, therefore, apart from, in addition, in my opinion, in spite of, on the whole, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76211521544 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579104477612 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8035652731 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6875 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254362030834 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827478633813 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103242747074 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147307022841 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110811848482 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.