Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusio

At the same time governments of some countries enact a law which prohibit to smoke in public place while other countries even do not purpose of doing this. We will consider both side of the position in this essay.
On the one hand, those who support injunction of smoking cigarettes in public buildings promote the idea that people health are endangered by inhalant smoke of tobacco. Examples can be seen in many develop countries such as Russia and Finland where these actions were taken and urge other nations to follow suit. Furthermore, proponents of smoking claim that environment in public places such as offices or restaurant has become much better and standing in these areas is enjoyable than earlier. To the supports of the idea these benefits are convincing.
However, other countries which do not stick of that law have different which related with imposing taxes and opponents of this point of view cite evidence from other countries where smoking in café or in other places is not prohibited. In this case it is proved that raise of taxes on cigarettes cause reduction of consumption of smoking. Moreover, there are another suggestion which government follow. It is proposed that packaging should be made nondescript and contained a warming about the smoking consequences which also influenced on people. This approach also appears to be quite powerful.
Overall, I would to tend to side with the countries where have passed laws against smoking tobacco. And it seems reasonable to regulate tobacco market by government which be beneficial for people health.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13565891473 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64204936636 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.93611136 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.923076923 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350214284575 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109391619181 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100364241797 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218549845822 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724153115345 0.056905535591 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.