Popularity of sporting events has risen sharply in the recent years. Governments all around the world take extra measures to train their players. One section of people believes that, instead of spending money on the sporting events, the same can be spent for other developmental activities. It is disagreed with the opinion that less money to be spent on sporting events. This will be analysed by discussing about spending on health and sports.
Some people believe that spending on sporting events should be reduced. They argue that these freed resources can be used on more pressing issues such as health. Developing health infrastructure will further the cause of healthy nation. However, sports involve physical exercise and sports persons are very popular. Due to their popularity, more people start playing games and therefore creating a fit and healthier population. Hence, spending on the sporting events should not be reduced.
Nevertheless, spending on sporting events have several advantages. Firstly, winning in a major sporting event like Olympics or world cup will bring pride and honor to the nation. Moreover, developing sports infrastructure will give an opportunity to host major sporting events leading to tourism development. This will help the economy by attracting more foreign currency and revenue to the government. By analyzing the above points, it is evident that spending on sporting events is just and fair.
In conclusion, debate on how to spend the public money is still not yet resolved. One view is to spend more on developmental works like health. In contrast, others believe on spending adequate money on sporting events by developing sporting infrastructure. Upon considering both the views it evident that benefits of spending on sporting events outweigh the drawbacks.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Arman90
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40989399293 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81969499568 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558303886926 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.8785379778 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.55 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.15 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308666227306 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103627660729 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854850711308 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200912211656 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775414762867 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.