Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive. Do you agree or disagree?
In the modern world, the innovation make the human life easy and more comfortable; however, some people believe that innovated technology devices such as mobile phone are separate the people from the society. I strongly believe that using mobile devices is isolated them, among the people.
Technologically invented mobile device, which called, as smart devices are help to build the relationship around the world, because such a device make up easy to browse the internet and social media networks such as Facebook, twitter and google. People can communicate each other’s and share the memory by sending the image or can work with the team, which is easily solved the complex task, by working from the home to anywhere. However, such a smart devices are making the people separate from the living society, when they play mobile game, browsing the world news and hanging on social media. For example, now a day we all know about the news around every corner for the world, but we do not about the neighbours, because we are not spending time with the society, which around us. Children playing the mobile game in the closed room and parent working via the mobile for their office works at home, that they often forget to spend valuable time with their children. The day we start, with the mobile phone until go to the bed, we all living with the machine not the society.
In conclusion, technology invention device providing the more comfortable and smart life but it is making gap between the people and society that lead to the lack of social interaction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 458, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'device'?
Suggestion: device
...home to anywhere. However, such a smart devices are making the people separate from the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97909407666 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46570277501 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533101045296 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.1933664638 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.909090909 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370824043122 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167641868406 0.084324248473 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15952268237 0.0667982634062 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322106947972 0.151304729494 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.238484746871 0.056905535591 419% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.