Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The protection of wildlife becomes gradually the most talk-about topic as a result of a large amount of attention as well as plenty of budgets allocated by governments, which can be utilized to improve people’s living standard. In spite of consuming huge spending on wild animals and birds, I think the short-term pain caused by an increase may be in the long-term interests of both the environment and human beings.
Many people find the budgets of preserving animals unnecessary, especially when comparing the costs with those of health care, or even education of the general public. However, environmental protection is not determined by considering the spending or attention. Instead, it reflects the attitude of human being to ecosystems. In fact, it is the long natural evolution that makes our planet appear to be so splendid and makes our ecosystems become sophisticated so that I think our environment which is made up of a variety of animals, birds and plants needs to protect its family members. By that I mean one of species, no matter how the specie is, playing its role and contributing to the ecosystems, should be respected and preserved. From this point of view, sheltering animals or birds is definitely to protect human being.
Another advantage of protecting animals is to build better relationships between people and other creatures on the planet. Many insects such as honey bees typically take the responsibility of pollinating flowers. This not only ensures the products of vegetables or farming crops but increases farmers’ earnings. `
By contrast, if our society allocated all funds to some particular respects like health and education, regardless of environmental protection, we would find people encounter a series of difficulties caused by environmental unbalance. The cost used to resolve these problems, in fact, are more than ever before.
I personally think that our society should remain constant attention in terms of protecting animals. Furthermore, the government might allocate reasonably funds to environment, health, education.
- The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people. But some people say that young people can also be a leader. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people. But some people say that young people can also be a leader. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas( in words, picutres, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opi 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...f health care, or even education of the general public. However, environmental protection is n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, i mean, i think, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43865030675 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13258676707 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622699386503 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.097244173 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127530647397 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398386441771 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342389898803 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067358662084 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215269972637 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.