Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by articially intelligent robots. What is your opinion.
Since a couple of decades, artificial intelligence has been coming with unbelievable innovations to carry out several jobs. While jobs that are easy to perform by following a set of predefined instructions will eventually be done by robots, jobs that demand situational based decision-making ability cannot be replaced. This essay will discuss why the majority of jobs will be replaced by intelligent machines except those involve distinct human skills.
Robots will carry out a significant number of jobs that are simple and entirely rely on programs written to execute them. Accurately programmed robots can execute a job more flawlessly eradicating human error that we observe many times. Add to it, installing robots in companies save on hiring, training and employing a human. In manufacturing industries, skilled labor has been replaced by intelligent machines (CNC machines) wherein precision is the most critical parameter while cutting metal sheet. In addition, wastage of raw materials due to an inaccurate cutting is almost negligible and less man force is required to operate machines. For these reasons, jobs that follow specific patterns will be replaced by robots.
Conversely, there are few jobs that require special human skills cannot be replaced because robots will never achieve the capacity to do them. Critical qualities such as a presence of mind are required to handle unpredictable circumstances. Along with professional skills, a human experience which is absent in robots play a vital role. Imagine an incident place that is on fire because of a faulty electrical connection need human skill to prepare an action plan and drive action quickly to rescue living things. All in all, substituting robots with humans for jobs which need human intellectual skill will never be possible.
It is increasingly likely that robots will replace a considerable amount of human labor. Least skillful jobs will eventually be taken over by robots, however, few jobs demanding human proficiency will always exist. It means the move of replacing maximum jobs by robots will give rise to increasing unemployment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-28 | abhikaus92 | 61 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 89
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it. What are the reasons? Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Some people say that traveling abroad is the way to really learn about another country. However, other people say that it is not necessary to travel as we can find enough information about other countries on the TV or through the internet. Discuss both vi 73
- Development in technology make our life complex, and we should try to simplify our life and stay away from these development. To what extend do you agree? 96
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view. 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Least'.
Suggestion: The Least
...e a considerable amount of human labor. Least skillful jobs will eventually be taken ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40963855422 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92047546621 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605421686747 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3130235027 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.647058824 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29411764706 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240611030447 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844083405514 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858845527672 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171976092847 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705161253435 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.