Undoubtedly, society is divided into two groups as per the distinct mindset of different people. Therefore, this has become a debatable issue whether government should help or not internationally. This essay will not only shed light on both perceptions but also my point of view will be elaborated in conclusion.
To commence with the first notion, there are myriad things to be shared in its favor. First of all, there are not enough rich countries in the world to give enough aid to all the poor countries to achieve the desired matters. This is because; there is no guarantee that financial aid will be effective if corruption exists within the poor country. The second point is, if there is continuous political unrest in poor countries and, aid will not have long term impact and may not be effective. To exemplify, unstable politics affect the wealth of that particular country. As a consequence, devastation of health and wealth is altered which cannot be fulfilled by any means of aid.
Moving towards the second argument of this debate, the first point of this issue is that, the money from rich countries comes from tax payers and should be used to benefit tax payers. For instance, rich countries have the responsibility to their own people before helping others. Apart from this, effective collection of taxes in rich countries means they have money for their developments of the country. As a result, government should answer for every tax payer how they spend the money. It should be used for their own development those who are relevant to abandoned people.
In conclusion, according to my perception, government should not need to help internationally although, it is useful yet money should be spend for their own people who face problems.
- Online currencies have become more common in recent years Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 89
- In many cities planners have separated schools homes shops and offices into specific areas which are widely separated from each other Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages for city residents 89
- More people have unhealthy diet and do not do enough exercises What are the reasons for this How can we encourage people to have a healthier lifestyle 84
- Some people think the best way to stay fit is joining a gym health club while others think doing everyday activities such as walking and climbing stairs is sufficient Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- In schools and university girls tend to choose art subjects while boys choose science subject What is the reason Should the trend be changed 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...r countries and, aid will not have long term impact and may not be effective. To exe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...this issue is that, the money from rich countries comes from tax payers and should be use...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
..., effective collection of taxes in rich countries means they have money for their develop...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...hough, it is useful yet money should be spend for their own people who face problems....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99319727891 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76251626889 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5278683935 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175985492571 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628069954689 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516461475305 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107417110785 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497407866903 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...r countries and, aid will not have long term impact and may not be effective. To exe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...this issue is that, the money from rich countries comes from tax payers and should be use...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
..., effective collection of taxes in rich countries means they have money for their develop...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...hough, it is useful yet money should be spend for their own people who face problems....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99319727891 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76251626889 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5278683935 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175985492571 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628069954689 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516461475305 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107417110785 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497407866903 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.