Some people opine that currently people have massive options. I completely agree with the view because of several reasons.
Firstly, the rapid technology advancement has led to many new inventions in almost every aspect of human's life. The aim of the inventions was to help people doing their everyday activities in easier way. However, this has negative effect such as turning people to be lazier and effortless than before. For example, in this modern era, there is a growing number of food delivery applications which offer different vendors and food menus with their own price variation. As a result, people become reluctant to shop for groceries and to cook because they can get food that they want easily.
Secondly, massive competition during this modern era has led into the emergence of many products in the same product category. Because every firm just want to be profitable, they started to produce products which are currently trending, with their own variations and price range. As a result, choosing a product become something that is tiring and time-consuming for some people. For instance, a guy wants to buy a black t-shirt and started to browse in his shopping application. Because there are so many options just for a black t-shirt, he became confused and took a longer time to choose which black t-shirt he would choose. Shopping then became something that is tiring and confusing for him.
In conclusion, I completely agree that these days people have massive options because the rapid technology advancement has created so many inventions which caused people to be more indolent and effortless. Moreover, massive competition during this modern era has led to the appearance of many products in the same product category, which made shopping became something tiring and time-consuming.
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Disucss both thes 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatifactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both the views and give o 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatifactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20136518771 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69841360983 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508532423208 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1797277538 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139532987747 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537509884863 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512382667827 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112024579698 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049253404171 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.