In this day and age, technology has progressed at an unprecedented rate. While it is evident that online education is booming these days, others argue that on-campus discipline is more propitious. In my opinion, the later thought is more opportunistic because it offers a practical approach as well as fewer distractions.
First, a virtual study is advantageous for its flexibility but it also permits multi-tasking. For instance, students, as seen in the COVID-19 pandemic, can easily open their devices and attend lectures or tutorials from the comfort of their homes, and also watch pre-recorded videos for revisions or better understanding as long as their is internet service. Another reason is that it saves time and money, as people do not have to spend on transportation and commuting to their schools. As a result, individuals think that online classes are a better alternative.
On the contrary, and as I concur, attending schools for studies seems more favorable. First, people from poor backgrounds suffer from the steep expenditure associated with data and those living in peripheral areas cite poor network coverage. Lessons done in virtual spaces require massive investment in laptops, cellphones and related service charges that usually difficult to shoulder. Secondly, although the Internet has opened a variety of opportunities, most of these classes depend upon the speed and the internet connection. Hence, physical lectures remove such distractions and provide an ideal and uninterrupted environment. Furthermore, in a traditional learning setup, you have the chance to network and bond with other students. This helps build camaraderie, and in turn, have better connections with people from distinctive backgrounds. Moreover, in face-to-face education, you can learn new concepts and skills alongside other students in real life. It’s easier to emphasize and learn from one another because you’re on the same long journey. All these advantages combine to make a strong case for distant learning.
In summary, although certainly, onbut in the end, humans are social beings and the process of learning can only be performed successfully in a social setting.
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 61
- In many countries the level of crime is increasing and crimes are becoming more violent Why do you think this is the case and what can be done about it 84
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 332, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ions or better understanding as long as their is internet service. Another reason is ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in summary, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48367952522 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05141771145 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632047477745 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7308335442 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124689058092 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371010459748 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474137006152 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682139808968 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525279191495 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.