Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with the children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to schoolwork. Which of the two approaches do you prefer?
It seems, in many cases, very difficult for us to prefer one to another because both of them have their advantages and disadvantages to the extent that is hard to distinguish. Yet, that does not mean they are all same to me. Which one I prefer dependence on my own experience, lifestyle and emotional concerns. To be frank, I prefer that some parents, who are always busy, spend their time to do some activity about the homework of their children for two important reasons.
In the beginning, I would like to mention that parents not only can effect on their children but also can teach many great habits to them. One of the important treatments that children can learn of their busy parent is the management of time. For instance, when I studied at high school, the work hours of my mother was around 10 hours. Although this time was not enough for my mother who do some daily activity, she was able to divide her time to some parts; such as help me to do my homework. In fact, this issue helps me to learn how can manage my time during day. Hence, my assignments are done by helping my mother.
Second, it is undeniable that each family can help their kids for improving the condition of them at school. If some parents, who spend lots of their time in outside, devoted the part of their time to their children, they can see the progress of them. For instance, before my mother helped me to do my daily assignment, I had not capable to get great score in my courses. I remember that the score of my math course was too low; therefore, my father who was mathematical professor in university decides to teach me math; although he always stay at university too late. Finally, both of us were so pleasant because my score is improved.
For what has been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that parents, who spend some parts of their time for helping their children; nevertheless, they have not enough time during day, were able to learn many thing to their children. All in all, children can learn how manage their time and they improve their knowledge in some course by helping of their parents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-30 | negar_nouri123 | 56 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following sentence? In the past, Young people depended too much on their parents to make a decision for them; today young people are better able to make a decision about their own life 73
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online game, and social networking Web site. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specific reasons and example to suppor 60
- tpo 44 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinion of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to young people than they are to older people. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'stays'.
Suggestion: stays
...es to teach me math; although he always stay at university too late. Finally, both o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'many things'.
Suggestion: many things
...ugh time during day, were able to learn many thing to their children. All in all, children...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in fact, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 65.0 24.0651302605 270% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53926701571 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43521918542 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494764397906 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9966062241 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169385392435 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635828928413 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681473364363 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121931005627 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310093002874 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.