Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is argued that authorities should manage the process of the new constructions, while others argue that investors have the right to choose their new buildings shape. Personally, I believe that it is better to let governments control this task in order to avoid expected harmful consequences.
On the one hand, people who argue that business owners should independently plan their buildings shape may claim that it is inevitable for their business thriving. This is because some investors decide to build business centers with one hundred level, for example, Dubai skyscrapers; therefore, they can get back what they have spent through collecting vast renting fees from other renter companies. Additionally, available budget is an essential factor in choosing building shape. In other words, if investors have few money to abide by governments recommendations, they will find themselves compelled to stop what they have started. Hence, there are different reasons support people decisions when they select their buildings design.
On the other hand, others may say that governments should control the final shape of any new building. For one, some governments tend to preserve the old style of their cities. For example, in Cairo, decision makers find that they ought to save city style in order to attract more tourists and be an attractive destination. Not only does this behavior can induce tourism level, but it also will probably save both its traditions and soul. For another, avoiding odd building may be accomplished by letting this task to governments. In Alexandria, for instance, the government prevents some developers from establishing any new project without collecting their pre-approval, and they give them only ten options to choose between them. Consequently, they can preclude any unaccepted design before its start as well as save Alexandria unique thirties shape.
In conclusion, despite the existence of few benefits of allowing investors to choose their style in terms of budget constrain and revenue, I reiterate that governments should take care of the decision so as to this can attract more travelers and preserve cities style.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | Mohamed Hafez | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to build'.
Suggestion: to build
...dget is an essential factor in choosing building shape. In other words, if investors hav...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...hape. In other words, if investors have few money to abide by governments recommend...
^^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun money seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little money'.
Suggestion: little money
...hape. In other words, if investors have few money to abide by governments recommendations...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 202, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nments should take care of the decision so as to this can attract more travelers and pre...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40412979351 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85087945787 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572271386431 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8863877073 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.133333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203618766832 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728959565439 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391288850071 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11791289943 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498823712084 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.