Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill Do you agree or disagree

Education is a key to the development and better shaping of the future of the world. It can't be argued that knowledge will be attained through studies. People nowadays believe that learning done from primary schools up to graduation is just facts and not practically feasible. I agree with this opinion because if the skill learnt is not usable then why to even gather it. I will elaborate my point further.
Today everything works on technology and intelligence that is far above the previous decades. To be able to cope with this advancement everyone needs to have the understanding of using it. Theoretical information is a great way to start with the process of learning which is followed in institutions and colleges but isn't it just a bookish cramming. As, when we move into the real world for jobs or employment this so called detail is nothing compared to the current scenario and the way the things work now. Companies in this fast pace world needs experienced employees and not just book-worms that have no experience of how to act in any situation.
Although, candidates get more and more sharp with all the kinds of books they read and understand the field they are going to join in the upcoming years. Still in a way the lack of real workplace environment is somewhat ruining their life and chances to success. Moreover, some field of education like engineering, architecture and management are having a great amount of data in student's textbooks which they see and learn to get aware of the nature of the subjects. Pupils might get good grades in colleges and universities but they will still not be a great asset to the society as all these career options need practical experience of the current market and the technological expertise to get a good result. There must be thousands of highly qualified and educated people waiting to get a job but still because of these old theories and text written in the textbooks, majority of these will remain unemployed and became a burden on the economy.
To close this, education should be given according to the current needs of the world and not just the useless old methods written in books and papers. There should be a practical class for the proper understanding and technical advancement of the student.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... shaping of the future of the world. It cant be argued that knowledge will be attain...
^^^^
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
... shaping of the future of the world. It cant be argued that knowledge will be attain...
^^^^
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...llowed in institutions and colleges but isnt it just a bookish cramming. As, when we...
^^^^
Line 2, column 549, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs experienced" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'experiencing' or 'to be experienced'.
Suggestion: experiencing; to be experienced
...Companies in this fast pace world needs experienced employees and not just book-worms that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...re going to join in the upcoming years. Still in a way the lack of real workplace env...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, still, then, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82051282051 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73120136222 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548717948718 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6504165135 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.588235294 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132996801358 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404622050341 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637644126279 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821174453691 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633689667262 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.