Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Today, people have various opinions about the efficiency of the pedagogical system, and this is a debateful question that whether practical skills should be prioritized instead of learning facts or not. I cannot agree or disagree with this topic, and my idea falls nearly halfway between.
On the one hand, some people consider facts as an integral step in the educational system, which gives students the opportunity to achieve a clear understanding of various subjects. learning facts, students can use them practically. For instance, students cannot produce and test chemical substances in the laboratory unless they have enough knowledge about chemical reactions, materials character, and so forth. As a result, although teaching facts can be time-consuming, it is well worth the effort. In addition, the educational system should assess their goals and structure at each level based on different cornerstones, including students’ skills, ages, and ability constraints. For example, primary students are not mature physically and mentally enough to do projects which university students can handle. For these reasons why this group thinks it is vital that schools spend time on teaching facts.
On the other hand, masses of people believe that the educational system had better invest more in practical skills. From an educational point of view, these skills lunch students on a path of creation and innovation. Besides that, practical skills help bodies to comprehend their talents and foster them in order that they can achieve better occupations in the future. In contrast, not only are facts not useful in real life, but also they cannot be kept in students’ minds permanently, and it is only a kind of time and energy-wasting. For example, most of the lessons children have learned at schools like geography and math formulas have no practical uses in future life.
In conclusion, from my point of view, the role of facts and practical skills is complimentary, and they make a profound contribution to students learning the process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | sanjugohel | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Tejwani | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | Tejwani | 73 | view |
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exampl 81
- The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- some people think that the teenage years are the happiest times of most people's lives. others think that adult life brings more happiness, in spite of greater responsibilities.discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Being a celebrity such as a famous film star or a sports personality, brings problems as well as benefits.Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own 89
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experi 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Learning
...lear understanding of various subjects. learning facts, students can use them practicall...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37962962963 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93077130444 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570987654321 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.981511267 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.2 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212692624745 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689424324815 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298303629129 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127618710706 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237402001732 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.