Prevention is better than cure."
Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Of course it goes without saying that prevention is better than cure. That is why, in recent years, there has been a growing body of opinion in favour of putting more resources into health education and preventive measures. The argument is that ignorance of, for example, basic hygiene or the dangers of an unhealthy diet or lifestyle needs to be combatted by special nationwide publicity campaigns, as well as longer term health education.
Obviously,there is a strong human argument for catching any medical condition as early as possible. There is also an economic argument for doing so. Statistics demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of treating a condition in the early stages, rather than delaying until more expensive and prolonged treatment is necessary. Then there are social or economic costs, perhaps in terms of loss of earnings for the family concerned or unemployed benefit paid by the state.
So far so good, but the difficulties start when we try to define what the 'proportion' of the budget "should be, particularly if the funds will be 'diverted from treatment'. Decisions on exactly how much of the total health budget should be spent in this way ' are not a matter for the non-specialist, but should be made on the basis of an accepted health service model.
This is the point at which real problems occur - the formulation of the model. How do we accurately measure which health education campaigns are effective in both medical and financial terms? How do we agree about the medical efficacy of various screening programmes, for example, when the medical establishment itself does not agree? A very rigorous process of evaluation is called for, so that we can make informed decisions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | Aman.Kansal1234 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Ahmed Shehata | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Ahmed Shehata | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | learnafren | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
- Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years.What are the reasons for this?Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbles and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this Information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these vi 84
- In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing. What do you think are the main causes of crime?How can we deal with those causes?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 84
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exampl 81
- some people think it is better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. other people believe it is good to have friends who sometimes disagree with themdiscuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...er term health education. Obviously,there is a strong human argument for catching...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ealth budget should be spent in this way are not a matter for the non-specialist,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, for example, of course, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.175 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95997711485 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5183905829 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.461538462 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252885098936 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780750093292 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692200421195 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141737580409 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856688025053 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.