Some people say that children given pocket money every week will have fewer money problems when they become adults. Do you agree or disagree?
When we were kids we usually ask for money from our parents, sometimes we were given pocket money weekly or per day. Some people think that it’s better for children to take pocket money, to know how to use it and don’t have money problems when they become adults, others disagree with this idea and believe the opposite.
On one hand, some people think that given pocket money, help children in the future how to deal with when they start making money. First, earning money at early age, help kids to understand the meaning why they are receiving it and know how, when, and where they can use it. Second, pocket money let children know how to manage their expenses, try to save money to buy anything they want, and depend on themselves. Moreover, when they become adult, this way will show it for their kids and teach them what to buy and when they should spend this money. For example, when I was kid, my dad used to give me a small amount of money each month and taught me how to manage and when I can use it. In my opinion I agree, since this way will lead us to be depended and know the value of the money that we are making it.
On the other hand, several parents prefer not to earn their children money, only when needed because it will impact negatively on them when they are adult. First, children at young age when have money will start spending them randomly on unused stuffs and keep asking for more and become irresponsible person. Second, some parents think that their kids must not hold money only for necessary, because they might lose it and won’t pay attention and some kids are reckless. However, having pocket money at early, won’t encourage them to work and become depended. For example, one of my friends until this age he still relies on his parent money, he didn’t continue his studies neither search for a job. From my side I disagree, where parents should teach their kids how to deal with money and be responsible person in the future.
In conclusion, some people think that given children pocket money is important, since they won’t face problems when they are adult, others disagree and believe are still young to take this responsibility. In my opinion, I prefer from the parents to give pocket money and teach them the value of it, to understand why they are doing this and for what purpose.
- Your friend wants to send her/his children to your house for the weekend. Write a letter to him/her and say– Agree to this arrangement.– Say what time is suitable for you.– Describe what you are planning to do. 56
- In many countries paying for things using mobile phone cellphone apps is become increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 78
- Some people say that schools do not do enough to teach young people about health. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The world is consuming natural resources faster than they can be renewed Therefore it is important that products are made to last Governments should discourage people from constantly buying more up to date or fashionable products To what extent do you agr 89
- Parents think that using computers or tablets will help children’s future academic career. What are the advantages and disadvantages? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, second, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 67.0 24.0651302605 278% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61282660333 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19294069478 2.80592935109 78% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434679334917 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.9170076002 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.375 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3125 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409893229654 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170133632908 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930430348567 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305926994756 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503354697044 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.