The lack of knowledge about history is always a big problem in education and society nowadays. That comes from the awareness of many people who think history is not as crucial as other fields such as science and technology. However, there are also some individuals who suppose that history should be treasured like the above subjects but these people usually account for the minority. It is not fair for history because of its contribution to humankind throughout the past until present.
There are some principal reasons to explain why many people assume that history is not important like science and technology. Clearly, the impacts of science or technology are easier to be aware than history, indeed, we can see the contributions of those two subjects everywhere while this facet in history is very rare. For example, what we use in commuting in daily like train, car, plane,... or eating like bread, hamburger,... those are all the products of science and technology; In contrast, the achievement of history is quite hard to list out. After all, the benefits from history are not conceived accurately, otherwise, this subject really brings much sake more than the people think. First of all, the essence of history is used to remind about the past; That seems no gain for people because of many perceptions about the past is over and nothing. But it went wrong, history shows us the origin of the universe until the mistakes, the wars and sacrifices in the past. These things invisibly help us correcting ourselves and understanding how peace can exist until today or how much was lost in the past to protect this simple thing. It is not over yet, the history gives the people the pride of their country, the excitement about the ethnic identity that history brings to. Besides, History also has interaction with and assists many other subjects; for instance, historical information about the division of the continents can be helpful in geography, the knowledge of the first inventions in the past can be used as the foundation of technology today. These above are just a small piece of benefits from history.
On the other hand, whether the statement that history has less importance than other subjects is incorrect completely. It is easy to sympathize because the contribution for humankind in substance and material which the people care clearly is too tiny. Meanwhile, the benefits such come from science and technology are well-known and continuous day by day; As an example, one of the first activity in a new day of many officers are reading a newspaper, and it is easy to see an article that has content about new accomplish in science while that of about history is infrequent or even does not appear. To be fair, this reality reflected the truth that history is really useless and no applicability in almost material aspects due to its intrinsic nature.
To sum up, although the poverty of history in application or less useful in real life as well. The history is still the biggest heritage of the time, and it needs to be maintained for now and the future. Let imagine what happens if we are beginning to forget history at present?-That means our later lineage will do what exactly we would do now. So let the history perfect our mind like a significant spiritual contribution.
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 67
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 61
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ommuting in daily like train, car, plane,... or eating like bread, hamburger,... t...
^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...lane,... or eating like bread, hamburger,... those are all the products of science...
^^
Line 3, column 1012, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to correct' or 'correct'.
Suggestion: to correct; correct
...he past. These things invisibly help us correcting ourselves and understanding how peace c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, really, so, still, well, while, after all, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 13.1623246493 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 41.998997996 207% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2747.0 1615.20841683 170% => OK
No of words: 560.0 315.596192385 177% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90535714286 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.8645985582 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67576936771 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 176.041082164 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492857142857 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 883.8 506.74238477 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9002305894 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.458333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259307897652 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762064334978 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613842097863 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153934048937 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068495891484 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.