Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, and there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is an undeniable fact that technology has revolutionized the way audiences watch movies in current era. Owing to smartphones and tablets, we can watch movies anywhere and anytime. Some section of the society nurture this belief that this is a substitute for going to the cinema, while some do not. However, I would argue that movie theatres deliver an unparalleled experience since not all movies can be enjoyed on small screen.
On the one hand, the advent of smart devices has put the cinema business at stake. This is because many people have begun relying on their smartphones to watch their favourite videos and movies at their home convenience. For example, there are many mobile applications, such as Netflix, Amazon Prime providing users access to millions of contents at an affordable price, including those which are not even shown in theatres. This has given people a good reason to enjoy movies with their families at home. In contrast, it would be costly and inconvenient should people have to watch movies in the cinema.
On the other hand, theatres give an unmatched experience that viewers cannot get while watching movies on a small hand-held screen. For instance, in movie theatres, films are projected on a large screen with a high-quality surrounding sound system and a comfortable sitting, where watchers can easily enjoy the film to the fullest. Moreover, many cinemas have recently introduced new theatre concepts to cater various customer segments, especially having latest VFX features. If cinemas ceased to exist, movie lovers would not fulfil their need for an immersive experience. Lastly, watching movie in a theatre is a great way of socializing.
To conclude, despite the convenience the small smart devices render for movie-lovers, I firmly believe that theatres still remain a significant option. Therefore, going to cinemas holds a crucial precedence for those who prefer experience over convenience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-09 | tsabatt | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-08 | ielts_tony | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-01 | hivafara77 | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-30 | matmat74 | 56 | view |
| 2021-01-31 | Junu93 | 67 | view |
- Multinational companies are becoming increasingly common in developing countries What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 89
- One of your friends invited you for a meal with his her family in their home You enjoyed the meal and had been happy to be introduced to his her family Write a letter to your friend In your letter thank your friend and say that you enjoyed the meal say wh 65
- Some people think that watching sports in one s free time is just a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 56
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets and there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- Nowadays most of the young people are advised to take a year off after completing their high school and before starting their university in order to either work or travel What are the advantages and disadvantages of this rising trend 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who prefer experience over convenience.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26688102894 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79508716815 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591639871383 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2021503715 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143747715087 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515960738276 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411991318963 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880997054391 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302711565676 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.