Some people say that online learning is the most effective and convenient way to learn Others say that online learning will never be as effective as learning at real school in person Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Online education, is widely believed, can bring remarkable efficiency and convenience to learners. Whereas, some people claim that conventional education is more advantageous. Im my opinion, I completely support both views.

There are no rooms for doubts that learning through Internet benefits learners massively. First and foremost is that online learning can provide flexibility. In other words, there are no fixed schedule, and students are more likely to manage or decide on their own studying time. Besides, a number of materials like function downloads and replays are available if learners neither understand nor catch up with the lessons. However this method still has some hidden drawbacks. Not all of the students after watching online lectures, reading electronic documents or materials can absorb information and, as the result, they are left with unanswered questions due to lack of contact to ask. Futhermore, the method also requires facilities and severely high discipline as well as self-learning skills.

On the other hand, face-to-face learning with teachers at school shows several fair aspects. In fact, at school, students will get nummerous oppotunities to receive wise advices from many different professors, who are aficionados and devoted guides. When learning in class, yet students can be distracted by many factors around such as noise from classmates. Thus, students hardly cconcentrate on the lesson thoroughly. In addition, whilst studying in a crowded class, it is difficult or even impossible to catch teacher's attention. That is why sometimes learners' problems are unsolved.

In conclusions, both methods have its own pros and cons. From my perspective, it is important to choose which would suit us.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (4 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...od still has some hidden drawbacks. Not all of the students after watching videos, reading...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... or materials can absorb information and ,of course, they are left with unanswered...
^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t oppotunities to take wise advice from many different professors, who are aficionados and dev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... advice from many different professors, who are aficionados and devoted guides. When le...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, of course, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36693548387 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86795045778 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.697580645161 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7814001089 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1875 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227934489814 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620385566477 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585747332641 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125683629041 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069039096127 0.056905535591 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.