Some people say that productivity depends on how a building is constructed. Please provide advantages and disadvantages of the same.
With the advancements in construction technology, architecture is continuously improving around the world. Since, a normal human being spent one-third of his/her time in office, it is often argued that workspace architecture plays an important role in one's working life. In this essay, the advantages and disadvantages of the workplace will be discussed.
Design of a workplace inspires people to go to the office. This is imperative as people tend to be attracted more towards working in an architecturally beautiful workplace. In my country, the central business district houses a number of buildings which are treated as artificial marvels and most of my colleagues always dream of working in such a place.
The ergonomically designed building will have a healthy workforce which results in higher productivity. As we are aware that to meet productivity in a company, a healthy workforce is a key ingredient without which it may incur losses. A better intelligently designed building will have walkways and gardens so that people who are working there can relax after lunch either by walking or simply sitting in the garden. This will keep their mind and body afresh.
A poorly designed building will become unpopular as soon as people start working in that. Buildings with unattractive architecture lower down the mood of the working class as it is going to be the first thing they are going to see before starting their work. Moreover, a lack of greenery and pathways will leave people nothing but to sit in the office all the time which may cause health issues.
To sum up, the design of a building has a vital role to play and it is important that workplace should give positive vibes to working class as well as provide options like pathways and garden for quick relaxation.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-05-22 | samgautam007 | 67 | view |
- Do you support that nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes? Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence. 73
- Many office authorities impose a restriction on smoking within the office premises. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom.What are your opinions on this?Use your own knowl 73
- Some people say that productivity depends on how a building is constructed. Please provide advantages and disadvantages of the same. 67
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them Do you agree or disagree 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, third, well, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04377104377 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90185688663 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3698020991 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116551341188 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432877237104 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315533017113 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637621461223 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0109658415453 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.