Some people say that technologies like mobile phones are destroying social interactions. To want extent do you agree or disagree.
Due to advancements in technology and with the introduction of internet and smartphones, it has been seen that people especially youngsters, have become hesitant while interacting others. This is mainly due to availability of these services in wide varieties and at cheap rate. I think it has played a crucial role in diverting people from socialising with others.
To begin with, there are huge variety of applications available on internet like Netflix for entertainment, Amazon for online shopping, zomato for online food, video games and so on. These applications fulfill the needs of an individual with just one touch. However, in the past people used to take someone else with them for shopping, playing games, etc. which not only provide them active lifestyle, but also improves the bonding between near and dear ones. Furthermore, people are so busy in their hectic schedule so they hardly get time for others, but whenever they get some leisure time they prefer to utilize on internet instead of quality time with family. As a result, it impairs the relationships and loss of respect for other members of family.
Moreover, today generation is so influenced by these gadgets that they believe their elders are good for nothing. Thus, they prefer to spend longer hours on phone rather than their family members. It also gives birth to anti social behavior in them. Besides this, this kind of lifestyle leads to many problems while interacting others like they lack communication skills, ethics and moral values. These values and skills played a vital role in everyone’s life in real world.
In conclusion, although it cannot be denied that modern technology has made our lives easier and hassle free, but Over dependence on it will have an adverse impact on the health and bonding of the people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-28 | kaka singh | 91 | view |
| 2020-11-05 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 78 | view |
- Television dominates the free time for too many people It can make people lazy and prevent them from socializing with others Do you agree or disagree Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 61
- You are member of an organization which meets regularly at particular restuarnt. The most recent meal you had there was not satisfactory.Write a letter to manager of the restaurant. In your letter -Explain why you are writing-Describe what the manager sho 78
- Today more and more full time university students focus on other activities rather than spend a lot of time studying Some people think it is essential for university students to be involved in other activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- A government's role is only to provide defense capability and urban infrastructure, such as roads, water and power. All other services, such as education, health and social security, should be provided by private groups or individuals in the community.To 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith others. To begin with, there are huge variety of applications available o...
^^
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f quality time with family. As a result, it impairs the relationships and loss of...
^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es this, this kind of lifestyle leads to many problems while interacting others l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10402684564 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65476965118 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637583892617 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6545399066 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0901679948796 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.027415046718 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027715714742 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0528829084145 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204448469463 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.