It is generally opined that the availability of options has peaked up in comparison to previous decades. I think, it is irrefutable that a huge variety of goods as well as services lead to more choices in people while making any decision.
Contemplating my first view, the purchasing power of individuals has inclined in a fast pace, owing to which, consumerism has noticed a dramatic rise throughout the globe, catalysing an indefinite number of companies to jump into a battle-ground of cut-throat competition. Therefore, to prove their superemacy over their rivals, some mandatory or unnecessary modifications in certain goods and services have been made, which, inevitably is providing people a variety in almost each and every aspect . This trend has grown in importance in past few decades. Mobile phones, for instance, in developing nations like India and China were not even available in markets just a quarter century back, however, currently there are myriad of brands and plethora of options available for people.
Furthermore, although these options are not only available in case of consumer goods, also in various other sectors such as food, education and work. One of the most significant precursor is globalization. Geography is history because of advancements in travel and transportation, the new multicultural societies are emerging due to the same. People can now study and work anywhere in the world, thus, the choices in universities and employment have reached the zenith. In addition, the variety of cuisines in international food chains has developed people's taste and has provided countless substitutes.
In a nutshell, the burgeoning requirements and demands of individuals are galvanizing the suppliers to work hard so as to make people satiated and these never ending needs are the fundamental reason for the current scenario.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... variety in almost each and every aspect . This trend has grown in importance in p...
^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... galvanizing the suppliers to work hard so as to make people satiated and these never en...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40549828179 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12856102229 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649484536082 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8299562738 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.083333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110896728713 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346164310856 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402658953774 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639897132143 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176200225728 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.