Some people like to spend free time with the friends of the same age. Others like to spend free time with people with different ages. Discuss both the views and state your opinion?
In contemporary times, it has become increasingly imperative to carve out leisure time from the humdrum of daily routines and spend it in the company of friends and family. However, the topic of whether one should indulge in social activities with individuals of the same age or opt to associate with those from different age groups has sparked a contentious debate. While some people gravitate towards the former, others believe in the significance of fostering relationships with those from different generational cohorts. This essay will delve into both perspectives and proffer my stance.
On the one hand, there are a plethora of advantages to spending free time with peers of the same age group. Firstly, it engenders a sense of camaraderie, familiarity, and ease, as individuals tend to share analogous interests, experiences, and challenges. This, in turn, can give rise to a powerful bond, underpinning long-lasting friendships that span across years. Secondly, it allows for engagement in activities that all parties enjoy, be it watching movies, playing sports, or visiting new locales, thereby creating an unforgettable shared experience.
On the other hand, there are equally compelling benefits to spending leisure time with people of different ages. Firstly, it broadens one's horizons and dispels insularity by exposing individuals to a gamut of distinct experiences, cultures, and lifestyles, thereby fostering personal growth and development, empathy, and comprehension. Secondly, it provides a platform for learning from individuals who have amassed more knowledge and experience, particularly in fields of interest, leading to intellectual stimulation and gratification.
In my considered opinion, although it is crucial to socialize with peers to form bonds and develop meaningful relationships, it is equally pivotal to interact with individuals from different generational cohorts. Doing so strikes a balance and contributes to personal and intellectual growth, culminating in a well-rounded personality. Striking a balance between the two depends on an individual's circumstances and preferences, and it is incumbent upon them to discover this equilibrium.
In summation, while there are advantages to associating with peers of the same age group, there are also significant benefits to interacting with individuals from different age brackets. Ultimately, the decision to associate with whomever is predicated on personal preference, and individuals should strive to strike a balance to derive the best of both worlds.
- You recently bought some food at a supermarket but when you got home you found that the food was in bad condition Write a letter to the manager of the supermarket explain what happened to you give details of the day and time of purchase ask the manager wh 94
- Some people like to spend free time with the friends of the same age Others like to spend free time with people with different ages Discuss both the views and state your opinion 78
- You have learned from a new article that a real estate company is going to build a shopping center near your home However you think that the shopping center should not be built there Write a letter to the city counsellor In your Letter Say how you learned 89
- Some people like to spend free time with the friends of the same age Others like to spend free time with people with different ages Discuss both the views and state your opinion 73
- Demand for gas and oil is increasing and so finding new sources in remote and untouched areas is a necessity Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...of different ages. Firstly, it broadens ones horizons and dispels insularity by expo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2176.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75661375661 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32026918378 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566137566138 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6099680239 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31901926166 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10395819568 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120902317707 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173350719517 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06982838534 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.